Active Stocks
Thu Apr 18 2024 10:45:15
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 162.65 1.62%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 284.15 3.57%
  1. Wipro share price
  2. 449.65 0.23%
  1. Infosys share price
  2. 1,416.25 0.11%
  1. NTPC share price
  2. 359.50 0.07%
Business News/ Opinion / Online-views/  Views| The rich did get richer after 1991
BackBack

Views| The rich did get richer after 1991

Views| The rich did get richer after 1991

Premium


Occupy Wall Street (OWS) captured the anger of an American public that feels cheated by the top 1% of earners in the United States, who appear to have emerged largely unscathed from the recession they helped engineer in 2008. This deep well of anger found echoes around the world as the OWS movement went global. India is not exempt – Occupy Dalal Street kicks off on Friday. The rise in income inequality in America is well-documented and is considered to be a root cause for the existence of OWS; as data show, India, despite ranking relatively low in income inequality, has still seen inequality increase in the last 25 years.

Of course, the redistributionist policies adopted in the 1950s resulted in a period of economic stagnation, where India grew at a “Hindu" rate of growth. Arvind Panagariya estimates that during the ten year period from 1978-79 to 1987-88, the average annual growth rate was 4.1%, while the average growth rate during the eleven-year period from 1992–93 to 2002–03 was 5.9%. According to Rodrik and Arvind Subramanian, India’s per capita economic growth rate more than doubled post 1980, from 1.7% between 1950 and 1980, to 3.8% between 1980 and 2000.

Banerjee and Piketty found that the top 0.1% were able to garner a larger share of total income in the 1990s, suggesting that they were best positioned to take advantage of the new opportunities accorded by the opening up of the economy. It would be interesting to see if this trend has continued over the 2000s, or if the share of the top 0.1% has stabilized since, with more people now equipped to take advantage of their connection to the global economy.

Another point of interest is that India’s top income share in 1999, while higher than China, was still lower than that of the United States, the United Kingdom, Argentina, Indonesia, Singapore and Finland, and only marginally higher than top income shares in France and Japan. Thus, although inequality is a concern, Indian policy should be directed towards ensuring equality of opportunity by so that more people may take advantage of India’s position in the world economy and create wealth for themselves rather than trying to ham-handedly redistribute wealth.

• • •

Keep up with latest news/ views on the livemint Facebook page

Follow livemint on Twitter for latest news / views / full coverage

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 03 Nov 2011, 02:03 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App