Tata vs Docomo debacle will have wider consequences for India
What started as the government poking its nose into a straightforward commercial arrangement is threatening to become another blot on India’s record of dealing with foreign investors — and New Delhi has only itself to blame.
In early 2009, NTT Docomo invested Rs14,500 crore ($2.2 billion) in an Indian wireless business on the understanding that if certain targets weren’t met in five years, its partner, Mumbai-based Tata Group, would either find a buyer for the Japanese company’s 26.5% stake at fair market value, or would take over those shares at half the original value of the investment, whichever was higher. When Docomo decided to exercise the option in April 2014, there was no taker for the unprofitable operations, so the Tatas sought central bank permission to pay out the equivalent of Rs7,250 crore.
By then, however, the Reserve Bank of India had a new set of rules that banned any exit by a foreign equity investor at an assured price. Still, the central bank, under Governor Raghuram Rajan, wanted to allow the payment because it was a question of an Indian company honouring an agreement, struck at a time when there was no clear law against options embedded in such an investment. Also, this clearly wasn’t a case of foreign-currency debt masquerading as equity. How many creditors agree in advance to a 50% haircut after five years?
Yet the Indian government, which had the final say, decided the Tatas shouldn’t be allowed to pay Docomo.
In January 2015, Docomo took the dispute to the London Court for International Arbitration. Last month, the court awarded the Japanese firm $1.17 billion (Rs7,840 crore at the current rate) in compensation from Tata Sons, the Indian conglomerate’s holding company.
The saga should have ended there, except that:
Bloomberg News reports that New Delhi intends to block the arbitration payment, too; Japan’s Nikkei says Docomo might ask a US court to seize Tata assets; The Financial Times has learned from a person close to Docomo that the Japanese company might seek enforcement action on Tata Group’s British businesses; and The Tata Group is countering that the struggling Port Talbot steel plant in south Wales, as well as UK-based Jaguar Land Rover, are owned by Tata Steel and Tata Motors — they’re not Tata Sons’ properties.
So the whole thing has become a spectacle. The Indian government’s refusal to take a commonsense view of Docomo’s claim was a poor decision. New Delhi is now making bad judgment worse by threatening to block the arbitration award.
Such actions have consequences. Not only has the government’s pigheadedness created unnecessary risks for minority shareholders of publicly traded Tata Steel and Tata Motors, it has also cast doubts on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s resolve to change investors’ experience of doing business in India. The Docomo debacle is the depth of dumb. Bloomberg