Delhi MCD Election Results 2017

Source: media reports

Ourview | The problem of plenty

Ourview | The problem of plenty
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Tue, Dec 13 2011. 08 42 PM IST

A file photo of BCCI president N Srinivasan
A file photo of BCCI president N Srinivasan
Updated: Tue, Dec 13 2011. 08 42 PM IST
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has reportedly cancelled its contract with broadcasting company Nimbus Communications for the telecast of matches played in India. Nimbus had bought the rights for an estimated Rs 2,000 crore in 2009-10 for four years. The company simply renewed its contract with BCCI that year, having been awarded the rights in 2006. At issue is payments not having been made on time.
BCCI is not wholly blameless. In its bid to milk India’s obsession with one sport, the administrator has packed the season with too much cricket. The world’s richest cricket body, it appears, believes in playing more to earn more.
A file photo of BCCI president N Srinivasan
This year, the 43-day World Cup was followed by the 40-day Indian Premier League (IPL), after which came the Indian team’s tour of England and then the West Indies. These teams then came to India for return games.
Clearly, the market is over-served. Since the IPL matches are dispersed across several cities, they take the sport to places that were earlier cricket-starved. That explains the empty stands in stadiums and poor gate collections. Also, some cricket buffs prefer to watch the game up, close and personal on television screens rather than brave traffic and security at stadiums.
Broadcasters should also examine their role in creating an unviable ecosystem around the game. Be it Multi Screen Media Pvt. Ltd, which purchased the IPL rights for $1.6 billion, or Nimbus, which forked out Rs 2,000 crore, the companies have paid astronomical sums. For Nimbus, the cost per match works out roughly to Rs 31.5 crore. The company can break even if it recovers between Rs 22 crore and Rs 25 crore from advertising as the rest can be made up from subscription revenue. However, it is nearly impossible to achieve this for every single match.
Although the advertising pie for cricket has expanded, the sharp increase in the number of matches has worked against the broadcasters. Apart from this, 30% of advertising has moved into IPL, which means there’s only so much to go round in the rest of the season.
Whatever be the outcome of the dispute, this is as good a time as any for BCCI to reconsider how best it can rework the schedule so that the game remains as vital as ever for the millions who follow it.
Should BCCI reduce the amount of cricket that India plays? Tell us at views@livemint.com
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Tue, Dec 13 2011. 08 42 PM IST