How to make a Salesforce-Twitter deal sound less dumb
As questionable as the strategic logic of a potential Salesforce-Twitter tie-up is, a deal may still be accretive to earnings next year
New York: Twitter bidders have dropped like flies and a takeover now looks unlikely, but the drawn-out sales process has whipsawed Twitter shares, sending the stock up and down about 30% in less than one month.
If you believe , it’s not entirely over yet. One suitor—Salesforce.com—may be crazy enough to still be intrigued by a potential deal for the beaten-down $13 billion social network, even as Salesforce’s own top shareholders pray CEO Marc Benioff and analysts warn that it would destroy billions of dollars of value.
Benioff is already annoyed his company lost a bidding war for LinkedIn to Microsoft in June and has complained to regulators in the European Union that the deal will provide Microsoft an unfair competitive advantage. He’s also been playing coy about whether Salesforce intends to buy Twitter. And as of Tuesday morning, we still don’t know for sure.
But what we do know—if this delivers any solace at all—is that Salesforce may be able to make the math work. The $50 billion company’s relatively low cash holdings (about $1 billion) means that unlike its bigger rivals Microsoft and Google, Salesforce would have to use its own stock to fund such a large deal. According to Bloomberg’s merger calculator, though, even if Salesforce were to pay a 30% premium for Twitter entirely with stock, this may not hurt its earnings next year.
That’s not to say Salesforce should buy Twitter. A potential earnings boost in the near term doesn’t make up for questionable strategic logic longer term. But Benioff isn’t a fool and says that he’ll only do a deal if management “absolutely felt like” it was the right thing for Salesforce shareholders. Let’s hope so, because right now there’s far more to dislike than there is to like about a Twitter purchase. Bloomberg