Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 15:59:33
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.90 2.00%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 1,095.75 1.08%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,448.20 0.52%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 428.55 0.13%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 277.05 2.21%
Business News/ Opinion / Clearing the road for GST
BackBack

Clearing the road for GST

There is just one sticking point in rolling out the goods and services tax

Illustration: Shyamal Banerjee/MintPremium
Illustration: Shyamal Banerjee/Mint

Union finance minister Arun Jaitley recently said that the draft legislation to enact the long pending goods and services tax (GST) is almost ready. He stressed that the passage of GST is among the three most important targets for the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government in the winter session of Parliament. Even at the earliest, GST is expected to roll out in April 2016, six years after its scheduled start.

When enacted, GST is expected to broaden the tax base, improve export competitiveness by removing several tax distortions from the Indian economy and create a seamless national market by removing inter-state barriers to trade. The resulting ease of doing business is expected to boost national income by as much as two percentage points.

Despite a consensus among all political parties on the importance of adopting GST, which is the single most important indirect tax reform in India, the Manmohan Singh government failed to build consensus on GST when it came to the details of implementation.

The NDA government, too, has had to tackle some very similar issues since it came to power in May.

The trouble is that the enactment of GST will obviate the discretion of state governments in imposing several indirect taxes such as octroi. As matters stand, GST will affect the revenue of each state differently and many states have quibbled over details of GST just to ensure that they are not worse off after it is rolled out.

Thus, revenue compensation has been at the heart of all negotiations between the Union and state governments, be they over the rate of state GST and central GST or the list of goods and services, such as liquor, exempted from it. If these frictions were not enough, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government decided to backtrack on adequately compensating the states for the reduction in the central sales tax from 4% to 2% in 2007 in a move targeted towards the introduction of GST in 2010. As of 2010, the Union government owed 13,000 crore to the states by way of compensation. Moreover, apart from the technical details, the states have asked for compensation for five years instead of three after the introduction of GST.

Reports suggest that even now, when there is consensus on almost every other detail, there still exist differences over whether GST’s threshold limit should include businesses with annual turnover of 10 lakh per annum or 25 lakh. The states, again for the purposes of shoring up more revenues, want to tax businesses as small as ones with an annual turnover of 10 lakh while the Union government wants a higher limit of 25 lakh.

The Union government’s argument is that states collect just 2% of their revenue from small businesses while 60% of the small businesses fall in the intermediate range. Having a higher threshold will have a salutary effect on small business activity without any dent on overall revenue collection.

The underlying issue is the same—the level of compensation to the states. But is it not just the states that are concerned about their balance sheets. The Union government, too, is worried about meeting its fiscal deficit target. Making matters more uncertain are recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission, which is scheduled to give its report by December-end. The recommendations of this panel may further tie up the Union government’s hands by asking it to devolve a greater percentage of the overall tax kitty to the states.

The stalemate calls for an innovative solution. And the answer, as it were, is blowing in the wind. The Union government has plenty of resources to compensate the states.

Consider Air India. The airline has been a drain on the exchequer for a long time. It is, in fact, the best example of why governments should not be in the business of running businesses. Every few years, the taxpayers end up bankrolling Air India.

In April 2012, the Union government had approved a 30,000 crore package to rescue the airline which is now expected to post a turnaround not before 2021. As of 30 September, Air India had a total debt of 40,000 crore. It is expected to post a loss of 3,900 crore for the last fiscal. This comes on the back of a loss of 5,100 crore in 2012-13 and a loss of 7,100 crore in 2011-12.

It is time for the government to put its money where its mouth is. It should sell off Air India and use the proceeds to abundantly compensate state governments to ensure the smooth and speedy enactment of a fundamental tax reform in independent India.

What should the government do to ensure the rollout of GST by 2016? Tell us at views@livemint.com

Follow Mint Opinion on Twitter at https://twitter.com/Mint_Opinion

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 23 Nov 2014, 05:31 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App