Price-to-truth ratio shows India’s banks are turning Chinese
Investors were reasonably certain that Indian lenders are more honest than the Chinese until Yes Bank, ICICI Bank and Axis Bank announced more NPAs than what was reported earlier
Latest News »
- World Bank raises $500 million with ‘pandemic bonds’
- Uncertainty looms over pub capital Bengaluru
- GST: Snack sales likely to be hit as higher tax may force makers to hike prices
- US labour secretary calls for increasing salary of H1B visa holders
- Axis Bank shares gain 4% after it declares 80% bad loans as secured
Singapore: The investment metric on which Indian banks appear most eager to ape their Chinese peers is the price-to-truth ratio.
While investors know better than to take the People’s Republic’s published bad loan ratio of 1.74% at face value, they have been reasonably certain that Indian lenders are more honest, following a 2015 review of asset quality by the central bank.
That belief received a major jolt on Friday. Yes Bank Ltd, the country’s seventh-largest lender by market value, said in its annual report that in March 2016—yes, one year ago—its non-performing loans were $768 million according to a central bank review of asset quality, and not the $117 million reported in the company’s audited accounts. Yes Bank shares fell the most in 21 months.
Similar disclosures this month by ICICI Bank Ltd and Axis Bank Ltd have revealed a combined 57% increase in bad loans from what CEOs and boards at the trio have been telling investors.
India’s supposedly better-run, privately owned banks aren’t suddenly seized by a desire to make amends for past amnesia. The red-faced admissions are occurring because the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on 18 April said that some lenders’ published financial statements aren’t depicting a “true and fair view” of their financial position. Starting with this earnings season, the RBI mandated that any hefty divergence in bad debt or loan-loss provisions between what its audit found and what the banks are telling investors must be revealed in notes to their accounts.
Now, the $3 billion of additional bad loans that ICICI, Axis and Yes have been forced to disclose don’t add significantly to what’s already a $180 billion heap of stressed banking assets, including both non-performing and restructured loans. Besides, some of last year’s problem loans may haven been written off or provided for; or they may have turned around and become standard assets.
Still, the delayed disclosures do call into question the 23% rally in Indian bank stocks in dollar terms so far this year. The MSCI India Financials Index, in which Yes Bank has the third-highest weighting, trades at a price-to-book ratio of 2.4 times, compared with 0.9 for a similar Chinese benchmark. On a price-to-truth basis, Indian banks look overvalued.
The extent of overvaluation will become clearer when State Bank of India Ltd, the largest by assets, announces full-year results on Friday. Punjab National Bank Ltd will report on Tuesday, and Bank of Baroda Ltd on Thursday. Between them, the state-run trio has more than $700 billion in assets, compared with less than $300 billion at ICICI, Axis and Yes.
If it turns out that the former too are sitting on more bad debt than the combined $33 billion they disclosed last year, investor sentiment could sour and the Indian banking system’s hesitant return to equity markets would again hit a roadblock. With that, the growing expectation that the most knotty cases of botched corporate debt will get resolved in 90 days would look like more hype than hope.
The more stratospheric the price-to-truth multiple for Indian banks, the bumpier may be their return to terra firma. Bloomberg