Washington: A Depression doesn’t have to be Great - bread lines, rampant unemployment, a wipeout in the stock market. The economy can sink into a milder depression, the kind spelled with a lowercase “d.”
And it may be happening now.
The trouble is, unlike recessions, which are easy to define, there are no firm rules for what makes a depression. Everyone at least seems to agree there hasn’t been one since the epic hardship of the 1930s.
But with each new hard-times headline, most recently an alarming economic contraction of 6.2% in the fourth quarter, it seems more likely that the next depression is on its way.
“We’re probably in a depression now. But it’s not going to be acknowledged until years go by. Because you have to see it behind you,” said Peter Morici, a business professor at the University of Maryland.
No one disputes that the current economic downturn qualifies as a recession. Recessions have two handy definitions, both in effect now two straight quarters of economic contraction, or when the National Bureau of Economic Research makes the call.
Declaring a depression is much trickier.
By one definition, it’s a downturn of three years or more with a 10% drop in economic output and unemployment above 10%. The current downturn doesn’t qualify yet: 15 months old, that 6.2% drop in output and 7.6% unemployment.
Another definition says a depression is a sustained recession during which the populace has to dispose of tangible assets to pay for everyday living. For some families, that’s happening now.
Morici says a depression is a recession that “does not self-correct” because of fundamental structural problems in the economy, such as broken banks or a huge trade deficit.
Or maybe a depression is whatever corporate America says it is. Tony James, president of private equity firm Blackstone, called this downturn a depression during an earnings conference call last week.
The Great Depression retains the heavyweight crown. Unemployment peaked at more than 25%. From 1929 to 1933, the economy shrank 27%. The stock market lost 90% of its value from boom to bust.
And while last year in the stock market was the worst since 1931, the Dow Jones industrials would have to fall about 5,000 more points to approach what happened in the Depression.
Few economists expect this downturn will be the sequel. But nobody knows for sure, and nobody can say when or whether the downturn may deepen from a recession to a depression.
In his prime-time address to Congress last week, President Barack Obama acknowledged “difficult and trying times” but sought to rally the nation with an upbeat vow that “we will rebuild, we will recover.”
The next day, Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee that the “recession is serious, financial conditions remain difficult.” He held out a best-case hope that it might end later this year, with “full recovery” in two to three years.
Despite the tempered optimism, the economic outlook remains grim. Consumer confidence has fallen off the table, stocks are at 12-year lows, layoffs come by the tens of thousands, and credit remains tight.
The current downturn has many of the 1930s characteristics, including being primed by big stock market and real estate booms that turned to busts, said Allen Sinai, founder of Boston-area consulting firm Decision Economics.
Policymakers and economists note there are safeguards in place that weren’t there in the 1930s: deposit insurance, unemployment insurance and an ability by the government to hurl trillions of dollars at the problem, even if it means printing money.
Before the 1930s, any serious economic downturn was called a depression. The term “recession” didn’t come into common use until “depression” became burdened by memories of the 1930s, said Robert McElvaine, a history professor at Millsaps College in Jackson, Miss.
Most postwar US recessions have come after the Fed has increased interest rates to cool down rapid economic growth and inflation. Later, the Fed lowers rates and helps restart the economy, with the housing and auto sectors both sensitive to interest rates leading the way.
This time is different: As Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd said, “Our housing and auto sectors are leading us not out of recession, but into it.”
What’s more, the Fed no longer has the ability to kick-start recovery by lowering interest rates. The central bank has already effectively lowered the short-term rates it controls to zero. And there are no guarantees the massive economic stimulus package and series of bank bailouts will stave off a nightmare recession, or worse.
Today’s economic indicators don’t project a depression. But Banerji is cautious. Economic data in 1929 didn’t show that the stock market crash was about to lead to years of economic misery, either.
The depression that consumed most of the 1870s and followed something called the Panic of 1873 makes a better comparison to what’s happening now, said Scott Nelson, a history professor at the College of William and Mary.
Financial markets had become centrally located by the 1870s, notably in London. And nations had not yet enacted the protectionist trade policies that were in place by the 1930s.
The results were not exactly promising. Gangs of orphans roamed city streets as men moved west to pursue cattle industry jobs. Widows struggled to make money by serving unlicensed liquor. Thousands of workers, many Civil War veterans, became transients.
The downturn lasted more than five years, according to the economic research bureau four times as long as what the United States has endured so far in this downturn.
Today’s recession is already longer than all but two of the downturns since World War II. But for now, public officials are being extremely cautious about the D-word. Alfred Kahn, a top economic adviser to President Jimmy Carter, learned that lesson in 1978 when he warned that rampaging inflation might lead to a recession or even “deep depression.”
When presidential aides asked him to use another term, Kahn promised he’d come up with something completely different.