×
Home Companies Industry Politics Money Opinion LoungeMultimedia Science Education Sports TechnologyConsumerSpecialsMint on Sunday
×

CIC favours greater financial and administrative autonomy

CIC favours greater financial and administrative autonomy
PTI
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, Nov 22 2007. 11 25 AM IST
Updated: Thu, Nov 22 2007. 11 25 AM IST
New Delhi: The Central Information Commission that has blazed a new trail in ensuring transparency in governance favours greater financial and administrative autonomy so that it is not dependent on government for its functioning.
However, the apex body itself is not clamouring for amendment of the RTI Act to vest itself with more powers since it would like to test the limits of the existing law before doing that.
“What is really required is administrative and financial autonomy. At present, we are totally dependent upon the government both for administrative structure and for our finances,” Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) Wajahat Habibullah told PTI.
He said Parliament should make a direct grant to the Commission instead of routing fund allocation through the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).
Stating that the Commission being a quasi-judicial body cannot function like any other government department which has deputy secretaries and joint secretaries, he said, what we need is “court masters and people with judicial background”.
Habibullah also made a case for freedom to recruit staff as opposed to the current practice of deputing personnels to the Commission from the government. “For this, first we will have to frame our own recruitment rules,” he said.
“We have placed a restructured kind of a proposal,” he said, adding the Finance ministry was favourably disposed towards it.
The CIC chief said he backed extending the RTI’s purview to include inquiry into judicial misconducts as proposed under the Judges (Inquiry) Bill 2006. “I don’t see why the judiciary should be treated differently,” he said.
To a question on institutions not covered under the RTI Act, Habibullah said the Cabinet Secretariat was mulling changes in the list of exempted organisations, as the list appeared to have been made “hurriedly”.
Reading out names of organisations from the list (termed as schedule II under the RTI Act), he said that some of these seemed to have been wrongfully granted exemption under the Act.
Asked if the Commission had suggested changes in the list, he said, “We cannot seek any changes. It is for the government to do that and the government has sought the changes. The Commission has no role to play in this at all nor is our view taken as to which organisation is to be included or not”.
While the list of organisations excluded from the purview of the RTI Act includes Intelligence Bureau and Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) amongst others, the central investigative agency CBI is also known to have sought exemptions under the Act, as stated in the Commission’s First Annual Report.
Asked about opposition among officials to share file notings with RTI applicants, Habibullah said that access to file notings was essential for the success of the legislation.
“File notings are no longer an issue and they are very much a part of the RTI Act,” he clarified.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Thu, Nov 22 2007. 11 25 AM IST