Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 15:59:33
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.90 2.00%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 1,095.75 1.08%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,448.20 0.52%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 428.55 0.13%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 277.05 2.21%
Business News/ Politics / Policy/  SC to examine allegation of interference by Sinha in coalgate
BackBack

SC to examine allegation of interference by Sinha in coalgate

'Either, we have to agree with the CBI or with NGO's counsel Prashant Bhushan making the allegations,' a bench said

The former CBI chief’s counsel Vikas Singh contended that judicial record spoke for itself that ‘false and malicious’ allegations have been levelled against Ranjit Sinha. Photo: Hindustan TimesPremium
The former CBI chief’s counsel Vikas Singh contended that judicial record spoke for itself that ‘false and malicious’ allegations have been levelled against Ranjit Sinha. Photo: Hindustan Times

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday decided to examine the allegations of interference and scuttling of investigation into the coal block allocation scam by former Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director Ranjit Sinha, who refuted the charges.

“We have to take a call. Either, we have to agree with you (CBI) or with him (NGO’s counsel making allegations)," a bench headed by Justice M.B. Lokur said while posting it for hearing on 16 February when it will also hear the application filed by Sinha accusing the NGO and its counsel Prashant Bhushan of perjury.

The former CBI chief’s counsel Vikas Singh contended that judicial record spoke for itself that “false and malicious" allegations have been levelled against Sinha and it cannot be that “just because he is Prashant Bhushan he can get away with any lie". Bhushan said the entries in the visitors’ register of the former CBI director made it clear that he was meeting the high-profile accused and those associated with coal block allocation like Vijay Darda, his son Devendra Darda and former union minister Subodh Kant Sahay and there was a need for court-monitored SIT investigation to ascertain “whether any consideration exchanged hands".

“If there is so much of evidence on record that this gentleman (Sinha) at so many times had meetings with accused and tried to change the course of probe and manoeuvre the situation for closing cases, then this court has to find out how this gentleman goes on meeting dozens of time and manoeuvres the investigation," Bhushan submitted while reading out his note in which he narrated the events emerging from the entry register of Sinha’s residence. Senior advocate Amarender Sharan, appearing for the CBI, contended that several contents including one about him (Sharan) in Bhushan’s note were factually incorrect.

However, Bhushan said all these allegations could be examined by the apex court-appointed Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) for conducting the prosecution of cases arising from the scam and the apex court can take a call on his report. He said the same procedure was adopted by the apex court in the 2G spectrum allocation scam when Sinha was directed to keep himself away from the cases arising.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Politics News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
More Less
Published: 12 Jan 2015, 07:35 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App