Process of filling vacancies of HC judges on war footing: Supreme Court
SC says the memorandum of procedure for appointments to the higher judiciary has been cleared and the process of filling the vacancies in the high courts is proceeding on a war footing
Latest News »
- Kolkata’s Apollo Gleneagles hospital fined Rs30 lakh over child’s death
- ED files money laundering case against terror groups, Kashmir separatists
- Govt launches index to rank 116 cities on quality of life
- Noida Ponzi scam: ED attaches assets of Ablaze Info Solution worth over Rs55 crore
- Bajaj Hindusthan drops plan to sell power business
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday said the memorandum of procedure (MoP) for appointments to the higher judiciary has been cleared and the process of filling the vacancies in the high courts was proceeding on a “war footing”.
A bench headed by chief justice J.S. Khehar, while disposing of public interest litigations (PILs) seeking filling of vacancies for reducing the huge pendency of cases, said progress has been made and the number of posts of judges in high courts would be increased by 25%.
“In the first stage, we will look into the filling up of vacancies of high court judges and then we will look into increasing the number of high court judges,” the bench, also comprising justices D.Y. Chandrachud, said.
The bench said a committee of senior apex court judges has been formed for suggesting ways for reducing the pendency of cases up to three years. It also gave liberty to Delhi BJP spokesperson and advocate Ashwini Upadhaya to approach the apex court if he wanted to suggest ways to increase the number of judges. The bench also disposed of other petitions pertaining to the same issue.
Earlier, this month the Supreme Court collegium finalised the MoP for the appointment of judges in the higher judiciary, ending a year-long face-off with the executive by agreeing to include the contentious clause of national security in a selection of judges.
It had agreed to the national security clause, which the government had been insisting be included as one of the necessary criteria for appointment of judges to the higher judiciary. The collegium after deliberations had also agreed on setting up secretariats in the apex court and the high courts to collate data about judges and assist in the selection procedure for their appointment to the higher judiciary.
Earlier, on 2 January, the Supreme Court had questioned the Centre as why judges and chief justices of high courts are not being transferred despite the recommendations of the collegium and asked it to file a status report on such pending transfers with detailed reasons in two weeks.