What should an agricultural export promotion policy focus on?
- Pakistan violates ceasefire along LoC in Uri sector of Jammu and Kashmir
- Taliban militants attack Afghan army post in Farah killing 18 soldiers
- Arun Jaitley slams regulators, auditors for Rs11,400 crore PNB fraud
- New H1B visa policy will protect workers, prevent any fraud: USCIS
- IndiGo to shift part of its operations from IGI’s T-1 to T-2 after SC order
Bengaluru: Addressing the 10th Agricultural Leadership Summit 2017 earlier this month, newly appointed commerce minister Suresh Prabhu said the government will soon announce a policy aimed at boosting farm exports. Prabhu was appointed commerce minister on 3 September, just a couple of months before the ministerial conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. He also underlined the need to eliminate restrictions in agricultural trade.
The emphasis on promoting farm exports is justified. This would provide a much needed boost to Indian farmers’ incomes. Farm exports will also earn valuable foreign exchange.
What are the challenges facing India’s farm exports?
India’s agricultural exports increased at a brisk pace for more than two decades after the economy was opened up in 1991. Although imports also increased, they were more than compensated for by exports. India’s agricultural trade surplus recorded a more than ten-fold increase between 1991-92 and 2013-14. Three years later, the picture is vastly different. Between 2013-14 and 2016-17, agricultural exports fell by 22% while imports increased by 62%. As a result, the trade surplus has fallen by 70%.
What went wrong? Prabhu’s predecessor Nirmala Sitharaman blamed a fall in international prices and loss of competitiveness due to currency movements for India’s plummeting farm export earnings. Things are unlikely to improve in the near future. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the Food and Agriculture Organization on the agricultural outlook, released in July this year, expects a flat to declining trend for primary commodity prices. The situation is particularly dismal for cotton, sugar and rice, which are major components of India’s agricultural export basket.
Not all of India’s farm export problems are due to global factors. A paper by Ashok Gulati, Infosys chair professor, and Shweta Saini, senior consultant for agriculture at the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), argues that the government is unfair in putting export restrictions on important food items to prevent inflationary pressures in the domestic economy. The policy deprives farmers of higher prices in the international market and also adds an element of income uncertainty. If the government is going to impose export restrictions when international prices peak, farmers would lose part of the incentive to cultivate exportable crops. Gaulati and Saini call this a pro-consumer bias in India’s farm policy. Previous Economic Surveys have also made similar arguments.
Biswajit Dhar, a professor of economics at Jawaharlal Nehru University, sees other constraints as bigger impediments to growth in agricultural exports. “There is huge scope for exports of processed agricultural products, but for that we need effective cold chains. The government needs to put in money to push infrastructure if exports have to be increased,” he said. Improvement in warehousing infrastructure would also counter inflation concerns due to seasonal factors such as poor monsoon rains, Dhar added.
India’s warehousing capacity for perishables is disproportionately concentrated in a few regions. Almost 50% of cold-storage capacity is concentrated in the states of Uttar Pradesh and Punjab. According to a report on warehousing in India by the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy released in September 2015, post-harvest losses of agricultural commodities is estimated to be at about Rs44,000 crore annually.
Then, there are policy-level challenges as well. India’s agricultural trade surplus could increase significantly if it cuts down on imports of pulses and edible oils. Pulses alone made up for close to 17% of the value of India’s total imports of agriculture and allied products in 2016-17. An earlier Plainfacts column had discussed how the cobweb effect dissuades farmers from planting crops like pulses on a consistent basis.
The cobweb effect means that higher cultivation leads to lower prices, which in turn leads to lower cultivation in the next period. The problem of bumper crops leading to a price crash can be taken care of by policies such as minimum support prices. However, large scale procurement of pulses would also make it necessary to distribute them through the Public Distribution System (PDS). India pursued the cause of legitimizing its procurement-based PDS at the WTO in the past two WTO ministerial conferences. The meeting in Buenos Aires might be Prabhu’s first big test on the agriculture trade policy front.