Central banks dance in denial on stagflation

Central banks dance in denial on stagflation
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Mon, Jan 14 2008. 12 16 AM IST
Updated: Mon, Jan 14 2008. 12 16 AM IST
There’s inflation and there’s deflation. Both are bad, especially in excess, though stagflation—defined as no or slow economic growth combined with a rising inflation rate—holds a special place in the darker recesses of the dismal science’s pantheon, not the least because of the dilemma it poses for central banks.
“Cutting interest rates to prevent a recession could stoke inflation pressures further,” says Joachim Fels, London-based co-chief global economist at Morgan Stanley. “Conversely, raising rates or keeping them unchanged could push the economy over the brink.”
Central bankers understand the options facing them. Yet, like deer frozen in the headlights of an oncoming car, they seem unable or unwilling to attack either the slow-growth problems facing the global economy or the inflation pressures. Instead, by adopting half measures, they act as if they are trying to wish the world’s difficulties away and continue to let them fester. By so doing, they increase the probability of eventually being overwhelmed by stagflation.
First, the “stag” part of the argument. US manufacturing sits near five-year lows, while hiring in December rose by 18,000, the least since August 2003. Meanwhile, European retail sales in November fell the most in at least a decade, and UK house prices declined 0.8% in the fourth quarter, the first drop since 2000.
As for the “flation” part of the equation, soaring food and energy prices have pushed the US consumer inflation rate to 4.3%, the most since June 2006, while the comparable euro- area figure is 3.1%, the highest in more than six years.
In theory, slowing growth should reduce inflation, because it widens the so-called output gap, or difference between a country’s actual and potential gross domestic product. Yet the causes of countries’ inflation have become more global.
Globalization initially helped lower inflation. “More recently, however, globalization has turned into an inflationary force, due to expansionary monetary policies in the emerging world, which fuelled strong overall demand growth, and specifically demand for energy and food,” Fels says. “Rising energy and food prices have pushed total inflation higher also in the advanced economies.”
Central bank responses to the stagflation threat have been a cross between generals fighting the last war and bureaucrats muddling through. The US, UK and Canada—which have relatively high interest rates—have eased monetary policy, while the European Central Bank (ECB), Bank of Japan and Swiss National Bank—institutions with relatively low rates—have shelved plans for rate hikes.
The Fed cut its key federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 4.25% on 11 December when the market was looking for more. Even so, as of yesterday there was a 70% chance the Fed will cut rates to 3.75% on 30 January, while the odds are 70% of a reduction to 3.50% on 18 March, according to futures prices. The odds of another cut to 3.25% in April are 63%.
Eventually, the Fed will have to give the market what it demands. Meanwhile, the ECB keeps sounding the alarm about inflation when the bigger risk is that euro-area growth will grind to a halt. The longer it delays cutting rates, the bigger the eventual rate cuts may have to be.
Instead of doing a dance of denial, central banks should show they are ahead of the curve, cut rates, restore growth and then turn their guns on inflation.
Any discussion of stagflation conjures up memories of the 1970s, when the term became part of the public lexicon after the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979-80 and the ensuing recessions of 1974-75 and 1980. Yet, much has changed. Countries are more energy efficient, economies more flexible and unions weaker.
“As long as there are no severe supply restrictions, we don’t expect further oil price increases to pose a major threat to world growth and inflation,” Deutsche Bank AG economists Peter Hooper, Thomas Mayer and Torsten Slok said in a November report. Better hope these guys are right—or that central banks bite the bullet soon—because the 1970s were an absolutely dreadful decade for investors.
Respond to this column at feedback@livemint.com
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Mon, Jan 14 2008. 12 16 AM IST