Bill Gates and Steven A. Ballmer of Microsoft Corp. have led a small army of high-tech executives to Capitol Hill, urging lawmakers to provide more visas for temporary foreign workers and permanent immigrants who can fill critical jobs.
Google Inc., meanwhile, has reminded senators that one of its founders, Sergey Brin, came from the Soviet Union as a young boy. To stay competitive in a “knowledge-based economy”, company officials have said, Google needs to hire many more immigrants as software engineers, mathematicians and computer scientists.
The top executives of these and other technology companies have been making a huge effort to reshape the Senate immigration Bill to meet their demand for more foreign workers. But they have had only limited success, as is often the case when strong-willed corporate leaders confront powerful members of Congress. Several provisions of the Senate Bill, meant to enhance protections for US workers and to prevent visa fraud and abuse, are seen as clashing with the companies’ recruitment needs.
The Senate plans to resume work on the Bill this week. Much of the debate will focus on proposals for granting legal status to illegal immigrants. But the sections of the Bill affecting technology industries could prove to be very important as well.
Technology companies want to be able to hire larger numbers of well-educated, foreign-born professionals. In particular, they want to hire more foreign-born scientists and engineers graduating from American universities.
The Senate Bill would expand the number of work visas for skilled professionals, but technology firms said the proposed increase was not nearly enough. High-tech companies were upset by the Bill that emerged last month from secret Senate negotiations. E. John Krumholtz, director of federal affairs at Microsoft, said the Bill was “worse than the status quo, and the status quo is a disaster.”
In the last two weeks, these businesses have quietly negotiated for changes to meet some of their needs. But the Bill still falls far short of what they wanted.
Stephen W. Yale-Loehr, co-author of a treatise on immigration law, said: “High-tech companies are very organized. They have numerous lobby groups. When Bill Gates advocates more H-1B visas and green cards for tech workers, everyone listens.
“But that supposed influence has not translated into legislative results,” Yale-Loehr, who teaches at Cornell Law School, continued. “High-tech companies have been lobbying unsuccessfully since 2003 for more H-1B visas. It’s hard to get anything through Congress these days.”
The Republican architects of the Senate Bill,such as Sentors Jon Kyl of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, thought they were doing a favour for technology companies when they proposed a “point system” to evaluate immigrants seeking permanent-residence visas, known as green cards. The point system would reward people who have advanced degrees and job skills needed in the US. But the technology companies were upset because the Bill would have stripped them of the ability to sponsor specific immigrants for particular jobs.
The companies flooded Senate offices with letters, telephone calls and email messages seeking changes to the Bill. Ballmer, the blunt-spoken chief executive of Microsoft, Craig R. Barrett, the chairman of Intel Corp., and other executives pressed their concerns in person. These advocates have made some gains, which are embodied in an amendment to be proposed by Kyl and Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.
Edward J. Sweeney, senior vice-president of National Semiconductor, based in Santa Clara, California, said, “I’ve spent many hours in Washington talking with senators to get their support on this amendment.”
Under the Kyl-Cantwell proposal, 20,000 green cards would be set aside each year for immigrants of extraordinary ability, outstanding professors and researchers, and certain managers and executives of multinational corporations. The original Bill would have eliminated the existing preference for such workers.
In addition, the amendment would give employers five years to adjust their hiring practices to the new “merit-based” point system for obtaining green cards. “For the first five years, employers would still have a say,” Cantwell said in an interview. “They could recruit the best and the brightest.” The number of green cards for employer-sponsored immigrants would gradually decline, from 115,000 in each of the first two years to 44,000 in the fifth year. No green cards would be set aside for employer-sponsored immigrants after that.
Many technology companies bring in foreign professionals on temporary H-1B visas. The government is swamped with petitions. On the first two days of the application period in April, it received more than 123,000 petitions for 65,000 slots. The Senate Bill would raise the cap to 115,000 in 2008, with a possible increase to 180,000 in later years, based on labour market needs.
Many technology businesses want to hire foreign students who obtain advanced degrees from American universities, and many of the students want to work here, but cannot get visas. Under current law, as many as 20,000 foreigners who earn a master’s degree or higher from an American university are generally exempt from the annual limit on new H-1B visas. The Kyl-Cantwell proposal would double the number, to 40,000. The amendment would also establish a new exemption, providing 20,000 more H-1B visas for people who have earned advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics from a university outside the US.
High-tech companies are lobbying on their own and through several trade groups and coalitions, including Compete America, the Business Software Alliance, the Information Technology Association of America and TechNet, a political network.
The technology companies face a serious challenge from a different direction, as lawmakers of both parties worry about possible abuses in the H-1B programme. Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the Democratic whip, and Senator Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, have a proposal that would overhaul the H-1B programme and give priority to American workers. Their proposal would also define, in great detail, the wages that must be paid to workers who have H-1B visas.
Durbin contended that some companies have used foreign workers to undercut the wages of American workers. And in some cases, he said, foreign workers come to this country for a few years of training, then return home “to populate businesses competing with the United States.” “The H-1B visa programme is being abused by foreign companies to deprive qualified Americans of good jobs,” Durbin said. “Some companies are so brazen, they say ‘no Americans need apply’ in their job advertisements.”
High-tech companies contended that the wage standards in the Durbin-Grassley proposal would, in effect, require them to pay some visa-holding employees more than some equally qualified Americans who are performing the same duties. For example, they said, they might be required to pay $100,000 a year to a visa-holding software engineer with a new master’s degree, even though the normal starting salary was $80,000.
The Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, said thousands of H-1B workers have been paid less than the prevailing wage. One company, Patni Computer Systems, agreed this month to pay more than $2.4 million (Rs9.84 crore) to 607 workers with visas after labour department investigators found that they had not been paid the wages required by federal law.