Blame money not pigs for China’s price scare

Blame money not pigs for China’s price scare
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Wed, Aug 15 2007. 01 06 AM IST
Updated: Wed, Aug 15 2007. 01 06 AM IST
What makes China’s worst inflation scare in a decade doubly dangerous is its deceptively harmless ­appearance.
Many analysts are inclined to write it off as a temporary food shortage, when it actually stems from a serious money glut.
The annual inflation rate zoomed to 5.6% last month, the highest in more than 10 years, the National Bureau of Statistics said on Monday. Food prices jumped 15%, driven by a 45% surge in meat and poultry.
Non-food prices, by contrast, remained well contained, rising just 0.9% from a year earlier.
It may be erroneous to make light of China’s inflation challenge just because the gains are occurring in food, rather than “core”—or non-food—prices.
It may be equally facile to view the surge in inflation as transient, caused by supply shocks such as floods and the “Blue Ear”, a respiratory illness that has killed thousands of pigs in China and curbed hog supply.
As Liang Hong, an economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in Hong Kong puts it: “Although supply-side disruptions may lead to upward price pressures, the buoyancy of demand plays a key role in determining actual price movements.”
Inflation, to quote economist Milton Friedman, is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. And China is no exception.
Food inflation
Just as loose global monetary conditions have caused energy prices to run away in recent years, surplus liquidity in ­China—the deluge of money entering the country through its record trade surplus—is now showing up in food costs, which account for a third of the Chinese consumption ­basket.
And just as monetary authorities around the world have been forced to respond to high oil prices by raising interest rates, the People’s Bank of China, too, will have to come up with a credible monetary-tightening programme to deal with expensive food.
“While elsewhere liquidity is sharply contracting as subprime problems spread, China is still experiencing excess liquidity,” says Jing Ulrich, the Hong Kong-based chairwoman of China equities at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Chinese interest rates have risen three times this year. On six occasions, the central bank has asked lenders to set aside larger reserves. All of this has been grossly inadequate.
UBS AG economist Jonathan Anderson says that unless the pace of the central bank’s foreign-exchange accumulation slows, China can keep tightening banks’ reserve requirement by 50 basis points every month for two years with no effect whatever on their present liquidity balance.
Limited options
China’s policy options look increasingly limited.
A major revaluation in the yuan is probably the only course left now to ensure that the Chinese economy doesn’t end up as seriously overheated as it was in 1994.
Back then, too, money supply grew at a breakneck 35% pace and much of the 24% increase in the consumer price index was on account of food.
As long as the yuan remains undervalued, China won’t increase interest rates significantly because it might attract even higher quantities of speculative capital inflows through, among other routes, over-invoicing of exports.
And that may give a further unwarranted boost to money supply, which grew 18.5% in July, the fastest pace in more than a year.
“Beijing will seek localized solutions as much as possible to deal with inflation,” says JPMorgan’s Ulrich.
Hard-landing risk
The Chinese government seems to think that the correct way to tackle food price inflation is to “stoke the farmers’ enthusiasm in raising pigs,” which is what it seeks to do by subsidizing as much as 80% of the cost of insuring sows.
This won’t make an iota of difference.
Even if pork prices stabilize, inflationary pressures will simply shift elsewhere, perhaps to wages and services.
The current subdued pace of gains in non-food prices may also alter quickly.
Credit Suisse Group economists Dong Tao and Christiaan Tuntono in Hong Kong expect China’s rate of non-food inflation to quadruple by mid-2008.
The case for aggressive monetary tightening is a compelling one. “Higher rates cannot help produce more food,” the Credit Suisse economists wrote in a note on Monday. “But bank deposits will continue to exit for other asset classes if real interest rates keep getting deeper into negative ­territory.”
China’s stock market, the world’s best performing this year, is already a bubble. If more and more Chinese pull money out of their bank accounts to buy equities, hard-landing risks for investors will only increase.
The authorities in China simply cannot afford to be fooled by the benign facade of the inflation statistics.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Wed, Aug 15 2007. 01 06 AM IST