WTO upholds Australia’s ban on cigarette logos
The WTO ruling could usher in a new wave of global tobacco restrictions from countries that have sought to deter smoking among their citizens through plain packaging rules
Latest News »
- Reliance Capital gets shareholders’ nod for demerger of mortgage arm
- Nithari serial killings: A timeline of the case so far
- India’s food regulator should learn from middle-income countries: Report
- Greece to return to bond market after three-year hiatus
- China hints at Ajit Doval-Yang Jiechi bilateral at BRICS NSAs’ meet
Geneva: The World Trade Organization (WTO) upheld Australia’s right to impose plain-package label restrictions on the sale of tobacco products, in a blow to the cigarette industry, according to two people close to the situation.
A WTO dispute settlement panel backed Australia’s argument that the rules it set in 2011 don’t violate trade law because they qualify as a legitimate public health measure, the people said, asking not to be identified by name because the decision isn’t yet public. The initial notification of the ruling was circulated to the parties of the dispute on 2 May, according to a spokesman for the WTO who declined to comment on its content.
The decision could usher in a new wave of global tobacco restrictions from other countries that have sought to deter smoking among their citizens through the use of plain packaging rules. Australia was the first country to prohibit tobacco logos, and many countries have hesitated to implement such measures after four countries launched the landmark lawsuits in 2012 and 2013. Philip Morris International Inc. and Japan Tobacco Inc. have argued that such rules could set a precedent for other countries to implement new labelling rules for tobacco, alcohol and junk food.
The full WTO ruling will be released in July, the people said. All parties to the ruling—Australia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Honduras and Indonesia—will then be permitted to appeal the decision, according to WTO rules.
Australian trade officials in Canberra and Geneva did not respond to requests for comment. Philip Morris didn’t respond to requests for comment and a spokeswoman for Japan Tobacco Inc. said the company had not seen a copy of the ruling.
The case was launched in 2012 and 2013 by countries including Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Honduras and Indonesia, who argued that Australia’s plain packaging law imposed unfair restrictions on the use of trademarks, geographical indications and other markings in violation of several WTO agreements.
Legislators in France, Hungary, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Slovenia and the UK, have already adopted their own plain packaging rules and similar laws are under consideration in Canada, Turkey, Singapore and South Africa. Bloomberg