New Delhi: Expressing serious concern over the growing instances of starvation deaths in the country, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said there cannot be “two Indias” divided between the elite and the poor.
A bench of justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma also asked the Planning Commission to explain its rational behind limiting the number of below poverty line (BPL) people in a state to 36% of its population.
“You can’t have two Indias. What is this stark contradiction in our whole approach in eradication of malnutrition. You say you are a powerful country but at the same time, starvation deaths are taking place in various parts of the country. It (malnutrition) must be totally eliminated and eradicated,” the bench told additional solicitor General Mohan Parasaran.
The apex court wondered what was the logic in the government claiming that there were adequate food grains in the country when thousands of people are dying on account of starvation.
The bench made the scathing observations as Parasaran sought to explain that the government was determined to reduce the malnutrition problem and streamline the Public Distribution System and that malnutrition is coming down.
“What do you mean by coming down? It must be eradicated,” the bench remarked.
The apex court cited newspaper reports that the country was witnessing bumper crops and the godowns were overflowing with grains.
“No doubt it is a very happy situation for all of us but if people don’t get the benefit, what is the use?,” the bench asked.
The bench made the critical remarks while dealing with a PIL filed by Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) complaining about large scale corruption and irregularities in the PDS mechanism of the country.
Questioning the plan panel rational in fixing 36% as the percentage of BPL families in the country, the bench said, “It is astonishing as to how you can fix 36% people in the BPL category in 2011 by relying on the 1991 census data.”
The apex court noted that a number of states including those ruled by the Congress have filed their affidavits insisting that the BPL percentage is much more that the 36 per cent fixed by the Commission and had sought more food grains for distribution among the BPL and APL families.
“How can you fix such a limit when the per capita income varies from state to state?” the bench said.
The bench also questioned the Commission for fixing the per capita daily income of Rs 20 in urban areas and Rs 11 in rural areas to determine the BPL category.
“How can you justify fixation of this meagre amount when even in the rural areas the amount is not enough.
“The deputy chairman of planning commission must explain and file a comprehensive affidavit within one week,” the bench said in its order.