War between Donald Trump, media seen escalating with presidency’s power
- When Ambani brothers’ bonds decoupled
- Deals Buzz: Quess Corp buys Tata Business Support Services for Rs153 crore
- Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2017) is very slick and not too expensive Android tablet
- Eris Lifesciences not eyeing any big acquisitions for now, says MD Amit Bakshi
- Jenet Yellen says she’ll leave Fed once Jerome Powell sworn in as chair
New York: Candidate Donald Trump railed against what he calls the “dishonest media.” Now, president Trump will have to decide whether to do something about it.
Trump has already called for tougher libel laws and has threatened to sue newspapers. While it will be hard for president Trump to take direct action that makes it easier to sue or silence news outlets, his appointees will preside over federal agencies including the Federal Communications Commission that oversee media ownership. The Justice Department can block industry mergers, issue subpoenas to news organizations and obtain search warrants.
Perhaps more importantly, Trump is challenging the legitimacy of traditional media at a time of low public standing and great financial stress for the industry, especially newspapers. In September, a Gallup poll found that just 32% of Americans have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in the media, the lowest level in the poll’s history.
“The biggest influence Trump has is to continue to undermine the core function and credibility of the press,” said Kelly McBride, vice-president of academic programs at the Poynter Institute, a non-profit journalism organization. “Everything the media does is based on the notion that it has relevance. The whole business model falls apart if you’re irrelevant.”
The Society of Professional Journalists, an industry trade group, is girding for a tougher climate for journalists, according to a statement on Wednesday from the organization.
Littered with attacks
“We saw a campaign trail littered with attacks against ‘the media’ and journalists from both sides,” Lynn Walsh, the group’s national president, said in the statement. “President-elect Trump’s past comments and actions about and toward the press foreshadows a potentially dangerous reality.”
Trump’s campaign pushed hard to discredit media outlets in the eyes of his supporters. He dismissed critical stories as lies and barred reporters from covering his rallies. He also threatened to sue the New York Times for reporting on two women who claimed he groped and kissed them without consent. He didn’t rule out suing NBC over the leak of the infamous “access hollywood” tape.
“We’re going to open up libel laws and we’re going to have people sue you like you’ve never got sued before,” Trump said at a rally in February.
Yet Trump can’t do much to weaken the nation’s libel laws, said Floyd Abrams, a leading first amendment lawyer. Those are enacted at the state level, and Trump would need to get states to amend their laws or get Congress to enact a federal law.
“I think he was simply unaware that there is no federal libel law,” Abrams said. “We have 50 state libel laws and they’re limited by the first amendment. There really isn’t much of a role for Congress, let alone the president.”
Trump will have the power to appoint judges who are less press friendly or are willing to challenge key first amendment cases like Times vs Sullivan, a 1964 landmark Supreme Court case that protects the press from libel claims. Right now, there’s one vacancy on the high court, and Trump will need Senate approval to fill it.
As president, he’s free to sue the New York Times. But that could force him to reveal embarrassing details about his business interests, like his tax returns, Abrams said. He may also recognize that the first amendment cuts both ways, said Jane Kirtley, a professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota.
“Trump has benefited from first amendment protection with his own attacks on a variety of people,” Kirtley said. “It would be completely shortsighted” to weaken that.
Regulatory agencies will provide Trump with another source of power, according to Abrams. CNN’s parent company, Time Warner Inc., will need approval from the Trump administration for its $85 billion merger with AT&T Inc. Trump, who repeatedly criticized CNN during his campaign, has said he’d block the deal.
Trump will have a harder time withholding information from the media as president. His administration will be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. And unlike his campaign rallies, president Trump won’t be able to decide which media outlets cover his news conferences, since the White House press corps decides who gets credentials, McBride said.
“I’m not sure he’ll fully grasp that he’ll need to provide the press with information whether he likes it or not,” Kirtley said.
Like past presidents, Trump will be able to play favourites, granting interviews with outlets he prefers and ignoring those he doesn’t during news conferences. Bloomberg News is a unit of Bloomberg LP, whose founder and majority owner Michael Bloomberg was a critic of Trump during the campaign.
He could also deal a financial blow to the media industry by doing something that he seems to abhor: making his administration boring, which would hurt TV ratings and pageviews.
“If he wanted to harm the media he would reduce the level of spectacle,” McBride said. “I’m not sure that’s even possible given how controversial he is.”
For now, it’s still hard to determine whether, or even how, Trump’s grievances with the press during the campaign will carry over to his administration.
“We don’t know if Trump’s potential desire for revenge will trump his desire to try, at least in the beginning of his presidency, to behave in a more statesman-like manner,” Abrams said. “One never knows with him. The level of unpredictability is so great.” Bloomberg