BackDemonetisation: PIL in Bombay high court challenges government ordinance
The petition, filed recently by Congress leader Sachin Sawant, has sought quashing of the ordinance issued by the government on 30 December last year on the ground that it caused discrimination against people
Premium
Mumbai: A public interest litigation (PIL) in Bombay high court has challenged an ordinance issued by the Union government restricting members of public from depositing the demonetised Rs500 and Rs1,000 notes in the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) branches.
The petition, filed recently by Congress leader Sachin Sawant, has sought quashing of the ordinance issued by the government on 30 December last year on the ground that it caused discrimination against people. The PIL says that the impugned ordinance allows only a particular category of Indian citizens to exchange the banned notes. This concerns only those citizens who were outside the country from 8 November to 30 December, when demonetisation had come into effect, as they could not exchange the banned currency with new notes in banks, it said.
Also Read: Modi calls opponents of demonetisation ‘political worshippers’ of black money
PIL, filed through lawyer Asim Sarode, is likely to come up for hearing in due course. The petition further alleged that the RBI had failed to follow its mandate of regulating the issuance of currency. “The apex bank should be asked to clarify whether it was working under some pressure or is being overpowered by any politician," the PIL further contended.
The PIL said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had assured the people and a government notification on 8 November last year also said that if the citizens of the country were not able to deposit by 30 December 2016, the scrapped currency notes of Rs500 and Rs1000 in the banks on account of any reason, they would get an opportunity to approach the specified offices of RBI by 31 March 2017.
Also Read: Money has lost anonymity post demonetisation: Arun Jaitley
However, the Centre’s ordinance had given opportunity only to those citizens who were outside the country during the period 8 November to 30 December last year, to exchange the banned currency. This was against the assurance given by the PM in his address to the nation and hence, it constituted to a breach of trust, the petition argued.
It also alleged that the BJP-led government at the Centre had set an example of “bad governance", which has resulted in causing hardships to the common man. By taking such a decision, the government had become more intrusive, the petition further alleged.
The petitioner, who is spokesman of Mumbai Congress unit, has also sought an interim stay on the impugned ordinance, pending hearing of the PIL in the high court. “Paragraph 4 (i) of the ordinance creates discrimination between people who travelled outside India between 8 November 2016 to 30 December 2016 and people who were not travelling anywhere outside India for no valid reasons whatsoever," says the petition.
The ordinance, dated 30 December 2016, is contrary to the earlier government notification of 8 November 2016, and hence people are facing many day-to-day problems and violation of their rights, the PIL alleged.
Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!
