The multiplicity of regulation on NBFCs can be confusing

The multiplicity of regulation on NBFCs can be confusing
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Sun, Jul 20 2008. 11 45 PM IST

Illustration by Malay Karmakar / MINT
Illustration by Malay Karmakar / MINT
Updated: Sun, Jul 20 2008. 11 45 PM IST
Non-banking financial companies or NBFCs have become an integral part of India’s financial system. In recent times, NBFCs have emerged as lenders to both companies and individuals. When it comes to lending, NBFCs are generally regarded to be complementary to banks and are often able to offer better services and products to their customers.
Illustration by Malay Karmakar / MINT
An NBFC is pretty much what its name suggests, that is, a company (not being a bank) carrying on financial activities. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Act, 1934, defines the term “NBFC” and various regulations passed by RBI govern NBFCs in India.
For foreign investment purposes, the government of India has specifically listed certain categories of NBFCs that are eligible to receive foreign investments.
India’s foreign exchange laws regulate and govern foreign investment in certain categories of financial service companies and the categories of activities which can be carried on by such companies after they have received foreign direct investment (FDI), referred to as FDI NBFCs.
FDI NBFCs are not necessarily the same as NBFCs defined under the RBI Act.
FDI under the automatic route (that is, without prior approval of the government) is permitted in 18 identified financial service/sector activities (including merchant banking, underwriting, portfolio management services, investment advisory services, financial consultancy, leasing and finance, stockbroking, asset management and venture capital).
However, the requirement of approval of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) would have to be tested against the provisions of Press Note 1, 2005, which under certain circumstances requires a foreign investor that has an existing investment in the same sector, as on 12 January 2005, to seek FIPB approval.
FDI is permitted in NBFCs subject to the prescribed minimum capitalization norms. Minimum capitalization in a “fund-based” NBFC for FDI up to 51% is $0.5 million, which has to be brought in upfront. For FDI above 51% and up to 75%, $5 million is the minimum capitalization to be brought in upfront and for FDI above 75%, the minimum capitalization required is $50 million, of which $7.5 million is to be brought in upfront and the balance within 24 months. Irrespective of the level of shareholding in a “non-fund-based” FDI NBFC, the minimum capitalization requirement is $0.5 million.
Press Note 12 of 1999 issued by the government of India identified investment advisory services, financial consultancy, credit reference agencies, credit rating agencies, forex broking and money-changing businesses as non-fund-based FDI NBFCs.
It is pertinent to note that the acquisition of existing shares of any FDI NBFC by a non-resident investor, from a resident shareholder, requires the prior approval of RBI since shares proposed to be transferred are shares of a financial sector company.
NBFCs may be regulated either by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) or RBI, depending on the nature of activity it is engaged in. RBI and Sebi generally avoid dual regulation of the same entity, that is, an entity registered with and regulated by Sebi is unlikely to be permitted to undertake activities that require registration with, and licensing and regulation by, RBI, and vice versa.
RBI generally regulates NBFCs that are primarily engaged in lending, finance and leasing activities. Such NBFCs are required to register themselves with RBI under the provisions of the RBI Act.
Moreover, any company in which financial assets represent more than 50% of its total assets and the income from such assets represents more than 50% of the company’s gross income is also required to be registered with RBI as an NBFC. For an NBFC to be registered with RBI, it should have a net owned fund of Rs2 crore.
RBI has, for regulation purposes, broadly categorized NBFCs into those accepting deposits and those which do not. Deposits include any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan other than share capital, capital contributed by partners of a firm or any amounts received from any bank or banking company.
Broadly speaking, NBFCs are regulated by the RBI Act, the Non-Banking Financial Companies (Non-Deposit Accepting or Holding) Companies Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2007 (applicable to NBFCs that do not take deposits), Non-Banking Financial (Deposit Accepting or Holding) Companies Prudential Norms (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2007 (applicable to NBFCs that do take deposits). RBI further issues circulars, guidance notes and policy papers from time to time in relation to the operations and functioning of RBI NBFCs.
Further, NBFCs not accepting deposits but having an asset size of Rs100 crore or more as per the last audited balance sheet are notified as “systemically important”. RBI governs NBFCs depending on whether they are deposit-taking, non- deposit-taking or are systemically important NBFCs.
Systemically important NBFCs are governed more strictly by RBI compared with other non-deposit-taking NBFCs.
Systemically important NBFCs are required to comply with cash adequacy ratios, single borrower limits, single investment exposure limits, etc., which are not applicable to NBFCs not accepting public deposits.
Recently, Sebi included systemically important NBFCs and certain other types of NBFCs not accepting public deposits as “qualified institutional buyer” for the purposes of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (Sarfesi Act). This amendment would entitle these NBFCs to subscribe to security receipts issued by securitization and reconstruction companies and would become entitled to protections accorded to qualified institutional buyers under the Sarfesi Act.
The multiplicity of regulations, directions and certain overlapping categorizations has often led to confusion. Given that NBFCs have emerged as a very important segment of the Indian financial system, any form of rationalization and simplification of the regulatory framework would be more than welcome by the industry.
Send your comments to This column is contributed by Niladri Maulik of AZB & Partners, Advocates & Solicitors.
Comment E-mail Print Share
First Published: Sun, Jul 20 2008. 11 45 PM IST