Modi’s demonetisation policy hurting poor: Ex-US treasury secretary Summers
Latest News »
- Barcelona terror attack leaves 13 dead, 100 injured, suspects killed, IS claims responsibility
- After buying Ibibo, MakeMyTrip is spending more on promotions than its net revenue
- Grasim Industries: holding company discount remains a concern
- NBCC investors wait for revenue growth with indomitable faith
- Opening bell: Asian markets open lower; PNB, HDFC Bank, Infosys in news
Washington: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s move to withdraw higher-value bank notes from circulation is hurting ordinary citizens rather than making a serious attempt at combating corruption, according to former US treasury secretary Lawrence Summers.
Modi this month announced that Rs500 and Rs1,000 banknotes will no longer be legal tender in a bid to crack down on counterfeiting and graft, effectively scrapping more than 85% of notes in circulation. It caught citizens by surprise in an economy where businesses and consumers often transact in hard cash. Frustrations have boiled over across the country as bank machines ran out of money and customers waited in long lines to exchange their old notes for new ones, while shopkeepers complained of slower sales.
“We strongly suspect that those with the largest amount of ill-gotten gain do not hold their wealth in cash but instead have long since converted it into foreign exchange, gold, bitcoin or some other store of value,” Summers and co-author Natasha Sarin wrote in a blog post on his website Monday. “So it is petty fortunes, not the hugest and most problematic ones, that are being targeted.”
Summers said that same argument he’s advocated for abolishing large denominations in the US and Europe can’t be made for poorer India. The Rs500 note—the equivalent to about $7.30—is widely used in the Asian nation, while the biggest denomination in the US—100 bills—are rarely handled by even the richest Americans, according to the blog.
“The ongoing chaos in India and the resulting loss of trust in government fortify us in this judgement,” Summers wrote.
The authors also questioned the efficacy of the measures. While the government assesses that the move could expose as much as $74 billion in unaccounted cash, opinions are mixed about its impact on future tax evasion.
“Without new measures to combat corruption, we doubt that this currency reform will have lasting benefits,” Summers and Sarin said. “Corruption will continue albeit with slightly different arrangements.” Bloomberg