India gets ‘partly free’ tag in Internet freedom survey
Washington: Global online freedom declined for the fifth straight year as governments around the world expand censorship and surveillance of the Internet, according to a group that tracks democracy and human rights. Nearly half of the 65 countries examined have seen online freedom weaken since June 2014, Freedom House said in an annual survey released on Wednesday.
One of the steepest declines occurred in France, which passed a law that many observers likened to the US Patriot Act in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attack earlier this year, according to the survey. Ukraine, mired in a territorial conflict with Russia, and Libya experienced sharp drops. India was ranked in the middle of the pile with a ‘partly free’ tag.
Overall, 18 countries were rated as ‘free’, 28 were classified as ‘partly free’ and 19 as ‘not free’. The most free among the 65 countries assessed was Iceland, followed by Estonia, Canada, Germany, Australia, the US and Japan.
At the bottom of the list was China, worse than runners-up Syria and Iran in terms of online freedom. Cuba and Ethiopia rounded out the bottom five. The report says 14 of the 65 countries adopted laws in the past year to expand government surveillance.
The researchers found 61% of the world’s population lives in countries where criticism of the government, military or ruling family has been subject to censorship.
And 58% live in countries where bloggers or others were jailed for sharing content online on political, social and religious issues, according to the “Freedom on the Net 2015” report.
In a new trend, many governments seeking to censor content from opponents have shifted their efforts to targeting online platforms, pressuring services like Google, Facebook and Twitter to remove content, the report said.
“Governments are increasingly pressuring individuals and the private sector to take down or delete offending content, as opposed to relying on blocking and filtering,” said Sanja Kelly, Freedom House’s project director.
“They know that average users have become more technologically savvy and are often able to circumvent state-imposed blocks.”
Freedom House said governments in 14 of the 65 countries passed laws over the past year to step up electronic surveillance.
The report said online freedom took a hit in France from new restrictions on online content that could be seen as an “apology for terrorism” and from a new surveillance law.
It also noted France’s “sweeping legislation requiring telecommunications carriers and providers to, among other things, install ‘black boxes’ that enable the government to collect and analyze metadata on their networks.”
In Libya, Freedom House cited “a troubling increase in violence against bloggers, new cases of political censorship, and rising prices for Internet and mobile phone services.”
In Ukraine, the report highlighted “more prosecutions for content that was critical of the government’s policies, as well as increased violence from pro-Russian paramilitary groups against users who posted pro-Ukraine content in the eastern regions.”
The report said most countries in the Middle East and North Africa, where the emergence of the “Arab Spring” in 2010 and 2011 was aided in part by activists’ use of online social media, were cracking down on government critics.
It cited a case in Morocco where police detained 17-year old rapper Othman Atiq for three months after he criticized authorities in online videos and said other regimes in the region resorted to “public flogging” of bloggers. Overall, 18 countries were rated as “free” online, while 28 were classified as “partly free” and 19 “not free.”
The most free among the 65 countries assessed was Iceland, followed by Estonia, Canada, Germany, Australia, the US and Japan.
At the bottom of the list was China, worse than runners-up Syria and Iran in terms of a lack of online freedom. Cuba and Ethiopia rounded out the bottom five.
Freedom House voiced special concern in the report about laws and policies, like France’s, requiring Internet firms to keep so-called metadata, which includes the time, origin and destination of online communications.
“While acknowledging that these laws are often intended to assist law enforcement in investigating crimes or security threats, the UN Human Rights Committee, the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, and other entities have recognized that the requirements inherently infringe on the privacy rights of all in a manner that is disproportionate to the stated aim,” the report said.
“Nevertheless, many countries—including democracies—have moved to retain or expand such rules.”