| | |
Rasul Bailay 11:26 PM | August 28,2009
Earlier this month, Subhiksha’s shareholder Cash and Carry Wholesale Traders Pvt. Ltd had filed an application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, to seek a compromise between Subhiksha and its creditors to whom the retailer owes at least Rs750 crore
|
|
C.H. Unnikrishnan 01:15 AM | August 11,2009
Ramkumar, challenged the orders of Mumbai and Chennai customs commissioners stating that there is no infringement of his patent by mobile phone importers
|
|
PTI 04:29 PM | August 05,2009
The company hopes to resume operations in three-four months and its management is working with lenders on restructuring the firm
|
|
PTI 09:39 PM | July 27,2009
The petitioner approached Sebi to review the price per share as otherwise he would be robbed the value of his shares, Sebi rejected it
|
|
C.H. Unnikrishnan 11:27 PM | July 17,2009
Earlier this week, IPAB had, on an appeal filed by mobile phone importer Spice Mobile Ltd, passed an interim order on staying operation of patent No. 214388
|
|
Reuters 09:31 AM | July 15,2009
Zenotech’s minority shareholders complained to the Madras high court that Daiichi Sankyo’s offer to pay Rs113.62 per share was too low and that they would seek Rs160 per share
|
|
Rasul Bailay 09:18 PM | July 10,2009
Once one of India’s fastest growing organized retail chains, Subhiksha today is in a precarious cash situation and struggles to sustain itself
|
|
C.H. Unnikrishnan 12:35 AM | June 19,2009
Questions raised about competence of customs to rule on patents, and the procedure for seizure of goods
|
|
Soumya Shanker and Malathi Nayak 12:44 AM | May 29,2009
Legal experts believe this is the first time a blog has been cited in a judgement by an Indian court, that have traditionally relied only on books and journals whose reputation has been firmly established
|
|
Vidhya Sivaramakrishnan and Rasul Bailay 09:40 PM | May 20,2009
The retail firm has shut all its 1,600 stores and is waiting to complete a process to restructure its debts by a group of about 12 banks
|
|
PTI 11:36 PM | March 23,2009
The Madras high court had commenced its hearings on 16 March itself but advocates, who remained defiant, had refused to appear before it, with litigants themselves turning up to argue their cases
|
|
PTI 01:09 PM | March 20,2009
Students with means to pay the tuition fees and have obtained average marks in their qualifying examinations can not compel banks to provide loans
|
|
PTI 04:36 PM | March 15,2009
The company has filed a revised return wherein it has claimed a refund adding there is no tax demand on the company based on a completed assessment
|
|
PTI 04:48 PM | March 13,2009
The Madras High Court was to hear the petition on Friday, but it had to be deferred due to the ongoing boycott of courts by lawyers
|
|
PTI 06:03 PM | February 17,2009
Holding ITC responsible for dumping the waste, the Madras High Court had asked the company to send the material back to the US, the country of origin
|
|