Who knew bankruptcy paid so well?5 min read . Updated: 02 May 2010, 09:29 PM IST
Who knew bankruptcy paid so well?
Who knew bankruptcy paid so well?
More than $263,000 (Rs1.16 crore today) for photocopies in four months. Over $2,100 in limousine rides by one partner in one month. And $48 just to leave a message. Explanations for these charges? Priceless.
The lawyers, accountants and restructuring experts overseeing the remains of Lehman Brothers have already racked up more than $730 million in fees and expenses, with no end in sight. Anyone wondering why total fees doled out in the Lehman bankruptcy alone could easily touch the $1 billion mark merely has to look at the bills buried among the blizzard of court documents filed in the case.
While most of corporate America may be just emerging from the Great Recession, bankruptcy specialists have spent the last two years enjoying an unprecedented boom. Ten of the 20 largest corporate bankruptcies in recent decades have occurred over the last three years, according to BankruptcyData.com, with Lehman snaring honours as the biggest corporate belly-flop in American history.
These megacases—Lehman, General Motors (GM), Chrysler and Washington Mutual, to name a few—are orders of magnitude larger than most bankruptcies in the past, and their size and complexity have created a feeding frenzy of sorts for those asked to sort them out. To date, Weill, the lead law firm representing Lehman, has billed the Lehman estate for more than $164 million in fees in that case alone. Analysts, lawyers and others involved in the larger bankruptcy boom say that some fees are legitimate—and that others are, at a minimum, highly questionable.
“There’s clearly pressure on people to create more revenue," says Robert White, a former bankruptcy partner at O’Melveny and Myers who retired in 2006 after practicing for 35 years. At one deposition he attended last year, each law firm sent two or three lawyers when one would have sufficed. “They were just sitting there on their BlackBerrys and talking to other people," he said.
With first- and second-year associates charging more than $500 an hour in some of these bankruptcy cases, according to court records, that can amount to some pretty expensive downtime. At several firms—including Weil and Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy—partners now charge $1,000 an hour or more for their bankruptcy services. But billable hours explain only part of the run-up in costs. In the seven months after the bankruptcy filing of GM, which taxpayer dollars helped keep afloat, various law firms and other advisers received nearly $90 million. Lawyers from Weil, which has accounted for nearly $16 million of fees in that case, put in for $364.14 in dry cleaning as well as more than a week at the Sherry-Netherland hotel in Manhattan last summer, where their rooms cost $685 a night.
In court documents, the firm responded that it could be tough to find hotel rooms in New York City for $400 or less and that dry-cleaning or laundry bills were appropriate for out-of-town lawyers required to stay in New York for nine or 10 days.
Think the lawyers are expensive? Meet the consultants. Alvarez and Marsal Holdings Llc, a turnaround firm that is essentially running what remains of Lehman, has billed more than $262.1 million.
No charges have been too big, or too small. The Huron Consulting Group, a management consultancy involved in Lehman, charged $2.54 for “gum in airport". In the GM case, Brownfield Partners has billed $230,209.55, including an $18 fitness-club charge.
Analysts say that such nickel-and-diming might be worth a laugh or two—if some of the larger fees weren’t snowballing so quickly as well. They say these bounteous fees reduce the money left for creditors in the bankruptcy cases. In the Lehman case, some unsecured creditors, including bondholders, banks and vendors, are likely to get just 14.7 cents on the dollar for their claims, according to Lehman’s proposed reorganization plan. Nor will they get their money quickly—some experts say they believe that the Lehman case could drag on for three to five more years.
Lawyers and restructuring pros who are picking up the pieces of companies swamped by the bankruptcy wave say that their fees are well-deserved and that their services help make the bankruptcy process more efficient. And they say the pay is more than made up for by a tidier resolution of a financial debacle—or, as in GM’s case, the revivification of a wounded company.
“The legal skill we used to sell Lehman’s North American capital markets business to Barclays saved 10,000 jobs and preserved the business itself, capturing value that otherwise would have been lost," said Harvey Miller, 77, a Weil partner who is considered the dean of the bankruptcy bar.
Many people in the industry agree that Lehman, in particular, is a huge case that tests even the most experienced lawyers. “Lehman is a sufficiently complicated company that it would be safe to assume that if it weren’t for equally sophisticated professionals running the Chapter 11 case, that the creditors would essentially receive nothing," says Stephen J. Lubben, a professor at Seton Hall University School of Law. “In those situations, it makes sense for sophisticated professionals to handle the case."
Others, however, have a distinctly different perception about the fees that advisers are harvesting in bankruptcies.
“It violates any sense of proportion," says Kenneth Feinberg, the Washington lawyer who serves as the “pay czar" for banks bailed out by the government and whom the court appointed last June to monitor fees associated with the Lehman bankruptcy. The court asked him to participate after concerns were raised in the news media about the soaring fees in the Lehman case. “Unemployment is over 9%, and to be paying first-year associates $500 an hour angers the public," he observes. “People read about all of this and say that lawyers and the legal system are one more example of Wall Street out of control."
Despite the rise in bankruptcy fees over the years, there was little or no public criticism or pushback until recently. Lawyers were reluctant to challenge their peers, fearing retaliation. Analysts say watchdogs from the US trustee’s office, a part of the justice department that oversees bankruptcies, were overworked and outgunned. Judges, many of whom used to work at the firms now benefiting from the bankruptcy boom, were also reluctant to challenge the status quo.
©2010/THE NEW YORK TIMES