This site uses cookies

This site and its partners use technology such as cookies to personalise content and ads and analyse traffic. By using this site you agree to its privacy policy. You can change your mind and revisit your choices at anytime in future.

Last Modified: Sat, Nov 17 2018. 05 54 PM IST

Supreme Court stays CCI’s ₹420 crore penalty on Hyundai

Hyundai Motor has been accused of allegedly violating antitrust laws in the supply of genuine spare parts and diagnostic tools

CCI penalized Hyundai 2% of its annual turnover in India for 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 for violating antitrust laws in the supply of genuine spare parts and diagnostic tools.
Priyanka Mittal

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a penalty of ₹420.26 crore imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on car manufacturer Hyundai Motor India Ltd for allegedly violating antitrust laws in the supply of genuine spare parts and diagnostic tools. A two-judge bench comprising justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Deepak Gupta was responding to an appeal by Hyundai against the CCI’s 27 July 2015 order.

“The directions by CCI are ‘extreme, vague, impractical and irreversible in nature’. These directions, which include putting into place a system to ensure that independent repairers have access to spare parts, technical manuals and diagnostic tools, training for independent dealers, and standardization of spare parts, are disproportionate to the alleged contravention,” the appeal stated.

CCI had also found Mahindra Reva Electric Vehicles Pvt. Ltd, a subsidiary of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd, and Doshi Holding Pvt. Ltd-promoted Premier in violation of competition laws.

While Hyundai was penalized 2% of its annual turnover in India for 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12, Reva and Premier were exempted from penalties.

The regulator had held that the three companies had entered into agreements that adversely affected market competition and abused their dominant position in the supply of spare parts.

Genuine spare parts of automobiles manufactured by these companies were not made available in the open market, which affected independent mechanics who compete with authorized service stations, the CCI order had said.

The CCI had also said that the designs, specifications, drawings and technologies provided by Hyundai to its equipment suppliers would not be exempt under Section 3(5) of the Competition Act, 2002, which protects exclusive rights granted under intellectual property rights.

Topics: Hyundaigenuine spare partsHyundai spare partsHyundai Supreme Court caseHyundai CCI case

First Published: Fri, Nov 16 2018. 11 44 PM IST

Latest News »