Harsh Mariwala | It’s time to destroy your business
When my father started to wean me into the family business, then called Bombay Oil Industries Ltd, I was wet behind the ears. Those were the days when we clung to models passed on to us over generations and hoped for the best. As I tentatively wet my feet, I figured I would have to change with the times and carve a niche for myself. That is why Marico Ltd was born.
How and why I went about it is something I intend to speak of in a book I am working on right now.
But I won’t digress. Soon after I got into the business, it was obvious to me I would have to destroy my business and its practices. I knew it wouldn’t be easy and I would have to look outside for help.
I have never shied away from seeking professional counsel. I must say that is why Marico is where it is now. Fresh ideas helped me see how to transition a commodity business with no clear differentiators into an entity with strong brands in its portfolio.
For instance, when I mention Parachute, coconut oil comes to mind. Saffola is closely associated with healthy eating. Kaya with premium skin care. We have taken these brands to other countries too and done well. This happened because I had solid inputs from all quarters, and I received professional support as well through all of my working life.
Even now, as an organization, we never shy away from listening to people who challenge our world view. That is also why often, we get some of the finest minds of our times to speak to the senior team and put their thoughts on the table. Else we fear we will atrophy.
It is against this backdrop that I invited Prof. Ram Charan to address the senior team at Marico to discuss and question fondly-held assumptions on the future. How do we navigate the digital landscape? How are we to cope with the kind of changes our businesses are being pummelled with?
The outcome of that session was a series of compelling thoughts.
By way of example, Prof. Charan suggested we look at the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) business. What, he asked, if the core proposition of the business is questioned? What if the FMCG part in an FMCG business is taken out of its DNA? Quite honestly, most of us in the room thought it an outlandish proposition. Because the moment you begin to take what lies at the core of a business, you begin to sow the seeds of its destruction.
But Prof. Charan had an altogether different take. The way things are evolving, he argued, it is only a matter of time before conventional FMCG businesses become redundant. It is pertinent then that players in this space ask what variables can potentially drive them to extinction. He pointed us to three.
Between these three, consumers are deploying extensive data to make informed buying decisions and the value chain is being transformed. So, in the longer run, if any company in FMCG has to remain in business, it will have to think of itself as a digital platform; or as he put it—a digital consumer company.
Come to think of it, what is Amazon or Flipkart? Go a step further and think of how the automobile industry has evolved. Ford doesn’t call itself an automobile company. Neither does BMW. Microsoft is no longer a software company. IBM is not only about outsourcing.
Talk to people in C-suites and they describe themselves as technology companies. They have morphed into digitally driven consumer companies, or industries, if you will. To that extent, the platform is the strategy.
The thing here is if the platform is indeed the strategy, there is a very good reason. “We ought to own the consumer”—a mantra chanted by pretty much everyone who has had a glimpse of what lies ahead.
To put that into perspective, clichéd as the example may sound, Prof. Charan asked us to dwell on Amazon. What started off as an online book vendor now competes against Microsoft. What makes this stunning still is that Amazon is winning the battle. Again, it is pertinent to ask why.
Like I said earlier, the three variables at work here allow Amazon to do a couple of things brilliantly. The algorithms offer them insights into a consumer’s behaviour. In turn, that allows them to influence what they buy. Between the digitization and sensors they’ve deployed, they have the ability to move incredibly fast and outpace competitors. Not just that, digitization provides them with just the kind of data they need to stay nimble even as they grow into gargantuan proportions.
If this were to be extrapolated with what Amazon is doing, it is to ensure a large part of their fixed income comes from the platform they are invested in—not the core business, as we understand it in the traditional sense. That is why it makes sense for them to pour more investments into the platform. In turn, this allows them the latitude to get into businesses they would otherwise not have imagined they had the muscle to elbow into.
By that yardstick, the new strategy for any company in the world we live in ought to be one that aligns itself to morph into a platform. If all of these lessons were to be extrapolated into what shape companies ought to take and what questions CEOs ought to ask, three come up.
First, own and influence the consumer digitally.
Second, invest disproportionately to build a platform. Going back to the FMCG example, what prevents a firm in the space to get into adjacencies like banks, insurance and farming?
And third, leverage technology to customize and tailor so that an individual’s requirement can be met—notwithstanding size. And all of these efforts will have to be directed in a manner that eliminates the middleman.
That is how companies can hope to deliver a seamless experience of the kind consumers have gotten used to on platforms like Amazon and Flipkart. This creates yet another question. How does a traditional company make what looks like a painful transition?
In the first instance, ensure initial financial risks are on the lower side. To do that, Prof. Charan asked us to imagine a scenario where, we at Marico for instance, were to dish out cheap smartphones that can be built now for as low as $30 to our retailers. What can they do with it? In the longer term, perhaps nudge them out of the idea of selling physical products. Because, he argued, we’d be off target if we aimed at others trying to sell coconut oil. Instead, we ought to aim at competing with Amazon.
This kind of thinking can be extrapolated to pretty much every industry and business I can think of. But before that, it is important to map out top-down the list of decisions and decision makers. That done, ask which decisions ought not to be made by humans. Because that is the only way we can build efficiency and consistency. As for strategic decisions, it can be made on the back of data the platform throws up.
It sounds plausible because I like what is happening on the mobile front. By the end of this year, more companies will roll out 4G. It is inevitable once again things will change dramatically. And once again, we need to understand what the implications of this will be on the psyche of the Indian consumer. That is why Prof. Charan insisted everybody in business ought to understand technology in much the same way we understand profit and loss statements.
If that falls into place, there is nothing that can stop competent firms from getting into adjacencies. For instance, one of the most compelling needs in the distribution business is access to finance. Is it possible to disintermediate the financier?
How about us thinking of building a credit rating agency for small retailers? It is entirely possible an FMCG company can build one because the space throws up extensive and reliable data. India doesn’t have a credit rating agency of this kind. Is the idea worth exploring?
Think about it for a moment. An FMCG company moving into spaces like banking and credit rating may have sounded loony. But technology and the exigencies of building a platform make this not just possible, but inevitable.
Eventually, this holds potential to create a direct-to-consumer company as well. In building an entity like that though, conventional thinking ought to be turned on its head. For instance, is sticking to core competencies necessarily the right thing to do? In this new world, we ought to think of new core competencies. Else we stand the risk of being pushed to the blind end of the wall.
We need to understand the blueprint of change on a two-year basis every quarter. And not on a 10-year basis as is the norm. This blueprint must have milestones and key performance indicators built into it.
We necessarily ought to be externally oriented if we are to make sense of all the information that comes in.
In doing all of this, where do we start from? Prof. Charan suggests everybody begin by asking two questions:
1.Over the next one month, what three things do we need to do that we are not doing to be a digital consumer group?
2. Over the next one month, what three things will prevent us from doing it?
In attempting all of this, we do not stand to lose much. What dent will it make to a conglomerate’s bottom line if it were to allocate Rs.5 crore to prototype, experiment, fail and learn fast? And if it hits pay dirt, it can scale as rapidly. Sure, there are risks involved in scaling. But there is no other way to build a platform of any consequence or overthrow fondly-held notions.
Surely, there is much to chew on as we rethink our way going forward. And if that means destroying your business to rebuild it for the future, it will have to be done.
An unabridged version of this article is available at foundingfuel.com
Harsh Mariwala is chairman of Marico. He is also the founder of Ascent Foundation, a not-for-profit peer-to-peer platform for entrepreneurs.