Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 14:19:25
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 156.15 2.16%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,456.50 1.10%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 432.80 1.12%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 278.05 2.58%
  1. State Bank Of India share price
  2. 758.60 3.34%
Business News/ Education / News/  Nursery admission: SC seeks response from Centre, UP govt over reservation
BackBack

Nursery admission: SC seeks response from Centre, UP govt over reservation

SC seeks response from Centre, UP on a plea challenging constitutional validity of RTE Act, mandating unaided private schools to reserve 25% in nursery to children from weaker sections

A file photo of parents waiting out side a school for nursery admission. Photo: Hindustan TimesPremium
A file photo of parents waiting out side a school for nursery admission. Photo: Hindustan Times

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has sought response from the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of provisions of RTE Act, mandating unaided private schools to reserve 25% in nursery classes to children from weaker sections.

A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar issued notice to the Union government and Uttar Pradesh government seeking their reply to the PIL in four weeks.

The plea has been filed by petitioner NGO Independent Schools Federation of India which said that the apex court has upheld the validity of 25% reservation in private schools for the children between the age group of 6 to 14 years. He claimed that even after the apex court verdict, the states are forcing private schools to also admit children below the age of six years in nursery classes despite that there is no constitutional obligation.

“Any such extension of reservation to children below the age of 6 years would re-open challenge to such 25% reservation as there is no such constitutional obligation under Article 21-A of Constitution," advocate Ravi Prakash Gupta appearing for the NGO said.

The petitioner NGO has also challenged other provisions of Right to Education Act which define ‘disadvantaged groups’ and ‘weaker section’ and give power to the states to declare any group of children as belonging to backward classes.

It has been contended in the PIL that by 93rd Constitutional amendment, Parliament has been empowered to make reservations with respect to private schools only in favour of backward classes and SC and ST. But by the RTE Act the benefit has been extended to any class of persons so declared by states to be belonging to ‘disadvantaged groups’ which is impermissible as per the Constitution.

It said that reservation in favour of weaker section is prone to abuse by authorities as 95% people in India transact in cash and do not file IT returns.

The plea has contended that states do not have power to identify any backward class and the power only rests with backward class commission whose report shall be presented in Parliament.

But under the RTE Act, states have been “unconstitutionally" given power which may lead to political appeasement of any group or class, it said.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Education News and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
More Less
Published: 04 Apr 2017, 05:07 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App