Does a 20% cut in healthcare spending hurt India?
Although that’s a significant cutback in allocation for a country with poor health indicators, it remains to be seen if its effect will be felt proportionately
- Kerala floods: One lakh food packets to be air-dropped, say Vijayan
- South Asian nations lead as world pays tributes to Vajpayee
- Kerala floods LIVE: Death toll above 160, NDMC to mobilise more resources
- Oil set for longest weekly losing streak since 2015 on Turkey crisis
- How Vajpayee fared in the 14 Lok Sabha elections he contested between 1957 and 2004
The government slashed its 2014-15 budgetary allocation for health by about 20%, Reuters reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed health ministry officials.
Although that’s a significant cutback in allocation for a country with poor health indicators, it remains to be seen if its effect on the ground will be felt proportionately, because actual health spending in the past three years actually fell short of budgetary allocation—overall and in each of the four departments under which health governance in India is organized at the top.
Yet, given that India is a low-income country and has an abysmal healthcare system, the case remains for higher public spending on health, accompanied by full utilization of allocations and better outcomes.
Although health budgets are under-utilized at the overall level…
…as well as in each of the four health departments…
…there remains a case for higher public spending in health, and better outcomes