Oil companies to face higher tax burden under GST: Parliamentary panel
- Proxy advisor questions legitimacy of Fortis Healthcare sale process; warns of class action suit
- USFDA finishes inspection at Alembic Pharma’s Panelav plant, shares rise on BSE
- Trump trade war spurs India to import more oil, drones from US
- What global finance chiefs are saying about the global economy
- Walmart sees Flipkart as key to atone for missteps in China
New Delhi: Upstream oil and gas producers like Oil and Natural Gas Corp. and Oil India Ltd will face “substantial additional tax” liability under the proposed goods and service tax (GST) regime due to the clipping of existing tax breaks, a higher tax rate on services and the temporary exclusion of five hydrocarbons from the new indirect tax system, a parliamentary panel has reported.
The new tax regime, expected to kick in from 1 July, seeks to streamline the tax system by pruning exemptions and establishing a seamless market across the country.
However, crude oil, petrol, diesel, jet fuel and natural gas have been temporarily excluded from it as part of an understanding between the Union and state governments meant to prevent any disruption in states’ revenue from the oil sector in the initial years of the tax reform. The GST Council is expected to take a call after a couple of years on the inclusion of petroleum products under GST.
The parliamentary standing committee on petroleum and natural gas chaired by Bharatiya Janata Party MP from Karnataka, Pralhad Joshi, which tabled its report in both the Houses on Friday, said if the import and excise duty exemptions on select goods for oil and gas production are not continued under the GST regime, it will lead to “substantial additional tax implication on upstream companies”.
Besides, the five hydrocarbons excluded from GST will continue to be subjected to existing value added taxes (VAT) and cesses. This would prevent oil companies from taking credit for the GST paid on the equipment and services purchased for meeting the tax liability on their output. Use of credit between the two systems of tax is not allowed.
The panel pointed out that offshore works contracts, which oil and gas producers get into and which at present do not attract state VAT, will come under GST. Also, service tax levied by the Centre, which currently covers only 40% of the value of such contracts, will be replaced by GST that will apply to its entire value. Also, the service tax rate, which at present is 15%, will make way for an expected 18% GST, imposing additional tax burden on upstream companies, the panel noted.
Services are expected to be taxed at three slabs—5%, 12% and 18%—with most of the services taxed at 18%. However, the GST council is yet to arrive at a final decision on the tax rates to be applicable on various services.
Tax experts said the exclusion of five hydrocarbons from GST will have an impact on the economy. “It would be very essential that necessary changes are incorporated in the GST legislation because the hydrocarbon segments missed out of GST are critical components in various downstream industries and are likely to face cost escalation leading to an inflationary effect on the economy,” said Prashant Deshpande, partner, Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP.
In the case of goods purchased from one state to be sold in another, the panel noted that a 2% central sales tax levied now, the proceeds of which go to the origin state, will be replaced by a much higher integrated GST (IGST), causing additional stranding of taxes.
Refiners using crude oil on which they pay excise duty, VAT and cesses, will have to keep separate books of accounts for petrol, diesel and jet fuel that will continue to attract these taxes and for LPG, kerosene and other petrochemicals that will attract GST. This will “increase compliance cost”, the report said.
The panel said the GST will lead to increase in operational cost of the petroleum products and can have a cascading effect across the supply chain. Therefore, some way of giving credit to the taxes paid should be found. It recommended the oil ministry to take up the matter of providing full tax credit with the ministry of finance for a mutually acceptable solution.