The costs of very low inflation
RBI may have an inflation target of 4% but what it should be really worried about is the cost of achieving and maintaining a very low inflation rate
- Gold prices breaking 3-day rally, silver recovers
- 75% of EPF balance can be withdrawn after 1 month of unemployment
- BSE, NSE put in place measure for enhanced monitoring of companies
- Sukanya Samriddhi account: In new rule, minimum deposit amount slashed
- Ethereum only radically decentralized platform outside of Bitcoin, says co-founder
With the Consumer Price Index (CPI)-based inflation coming in at 2.18% for May, the question that arises is: is there a cost to keeping inflation so low?
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) may have an inflation target of 4% but what it should be really worried about is the cost of achieving and maintaining a very low inflation rate.
At times, even the absence of interest rate cuts hurts growth. Any central bank worth its salt should be worried about how much growth it is ready to sacrifice in order to push down the inflation rate to very low levels.
This is particularly true because food prices have a large weightage in CPI and the flip side of deflationary food prices is being seen in farmers’ agitations throughout the country. Note that food prices in May 2017 fell by 1.05% from a year ago.
While it’s a separate argument on what inflation rate is long-term growth friendly, the central bank is always monitoring something called the “sacrifice ratio”. This ratio is the cost of reducing inflation, the loss of output that must be sustained by the economy in order to achieve a reduction in trend inflation. In statistical terms, it is defined as a ratio of the percentage loss of real output to 1% reduction in trend inflation.
The sacrifice ratio, according to an RBI study in 2015, was lower during periods of contractionary monetary policy than during expansionary ones.
RBI’s Households’ Inflation Expectations Survey shows a declining trend for nearly four quarters now.
But how much growth will the central bank be comfortable sacrificing?
Gross value-added (GVA) growth at constant prices was already 1.32 percentage points down to 6.6% in fiscal year 2017 (FY17). The inflation rate was down by 0.41 percentage points to 4.52%.
This makes it look like RBI gave up too much on growth in its pursuit of curbing inflation. In the central bank’s own words, the demonetization impact was transitory and the slowdown is primarily due to decelerating investment demand.
If we take RBI’s real GVA growth forecast of 7.3% for FY18 and assume that the central bank would achieve the 4% inflation target this year, then a loosely calculated sacrifice ratio (assuming potential growth rate of the Indian economy at 9%) works out to 3.4.
This means that for every one percentage point decrease in inflation, RBI risks destroying 3.4 percentage points of growth. That looks like a high price to pay, but much would depend on what the potential rate of growth actually is and there is little agreement on that.
Nevertheless, the notion of a “sacrifice ratio” does highlight the fact that forcing inflation down below a threshold level has a cost attached to it. And apart from the economic cost, the social cost in the farm sector of deflationary food prices also needs to be kept in mind.
Editor's Picks »
- BlackBerry Key2 with DTEK, physical keyboard launched in India; price, specifications
- Groundwater in Sterlite plant area contaminated beyond permissible limits: Govt
- Ace Turtle to foray into online FMCG, electronics retail
- Lok Sabha passes Negotiable Instruments Act amendment to cut litigation over bounced cheques
- Govt to park shares of PSUs in investment fund to meet public float rule
- Bajaj Auto’s dismal Q1 results builds a case for FY2019 earnings cut
- GST on paints cut, but companies may not pass on full benefit immediately
- June quarter results signal Havells India is off to a bright start this fiscal
- Business gains, not just cost efficiencies, to determine UPL’s Arysta acquisition success
- What ABB India’s performance in June quarter says about capex growth