Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 15:59:33
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.90 2.00%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 1,095.75 1.08%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,448.20 0.52%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 428.55 0.13%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 277.05 2.21%
Business News/ Opinion / Online-views/  Learning to live with YouTube
BackBack

Learning to live with YouTube

Learning to live with YouTube

Premium


The Guwahati incident was unfolding at about the same that the Pew Research Center in Washington DC released the findings of a 15-month study of what people watch most on YouTube. In 2011, news events were the most searched on YouTube in four months out of 12. The study concluded that this video-sharing site was now the world’s most popular single news source.

Footage from news organizations constituted the balance of news accessed, but here by contrast 35% was raw, 65% edited. What Pew did was to look at the top five videos each week between January 2011 and March 2012, and it found that the most popular news videos were a mix of edited and raw footage. The study says raw footage is now part of a newsroom’s toolset. Primarily because YouTube as a platform enables its access.

So let’s look at what the emergence of YouTube as a news site and news source means in terms of raw footage gaining primacy over edited visual news. It means there is a terrific resource out there at times of disasters and breaking political news. For both news organizations and citizen viewers. In the period under survey, the Japanese earthquake and tsunami was No. 1 with 5% of all the 260 videos watched, followed by elections in Russia (5%) and unrest in the Middle East (4%).

Yet newsrooms now face a dilemma arising from the new technologies. If 9/11 had happened 10 years later scores of handycam videos would have been on YouTube. And it would not have been easy for newsrooms to take the same decision they did back in 2001 of protecting the dignity of the dead by keeping the gore out. The advent of YouTube has changed the game. Footage becomes more potent because of this platform. It makes going viral possible. Including shots of a dead Muammar Gadhafi or a Saddam Hussein whose gory pictures can be paraded on the news.

It also spells an emerging news culture which is being shaped by easy access to technology. Audience-seeking news organizations are increasingly willing to convert lurid excesses filmed and uploaded by their own reporter or somebody else, into the stuff of news. That includes not just a channel such as News Live whose editor Atanu Bhuyan uploaded a three-video series called “Girl in the City" between 11 and 12 July on YouTube, but also dozens of lurid MMS clips which find their way into news. Something is changing and it’s not exactly improving our civilizational quotient.

Vigilante morality is now upping the ante for what is permissible in the garb of news. Moral judgements creep into Bhuyan’s tweets. “CCTV footage of Club Mint bar shows the molestation victim with two of her female friends apparently drunk after consuming alcohol#Guwahati." Followed by, “The footages also suggests they fought among themselves inside the bar and even had a heated argument after coming out of the bar#Guwahati ." Then he says, “Hathi jai bajare, kukur bhuke hajare" (If the elephant goes to the market, dogs will bark.) Meaning what?

Raw footage has immediacy. It can ignite revolutions, but it can also violate persons in savage ways. And it is aiding a coarsening of what passes for news. One of Bhuyan’s “Girl in the City" videos has been removed from YouTube. The other two show the girl being mauled after she has fallen to the ground, her clothes being pulled at. And when she manages to stagger to her feet, guess what? She has a mike stuck into her face by a reporter.

As for the Delhi-based channels who went on to host discussions on the ethics of this incident—just because some footage is downloadable do you have to use it in your news bulletin? Everybody did. NDTV, Headlines Today, NewsX, Samay Live news, CNN IBN and others.

If you use embarrassing (and that is a mild word) footage of Abhishek Singhvi from YouTube he will sue you, so you don’t. But an assaulted schoolgirl on a Guwahati street is fair game.

The crudely graphic use of language on Hindi channels like Aaj Tak and IBN7 which accompanied the show of footage, should not be the stuff of news. They kept hollering that she was being scratched, torn apart. And Ravish Kumar’s moralistic thundering on NDTV India is not news either. Living off saleable footage for an inordinately long time is not news. But that is what YouTube has made possible.

Sevanti Ninan is a media critic, author and editor of the media watch website thehoot.org. She examines the larger issues related to the media in a fortnightly column.

Respond to this column at feedback@livemint.com

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 19 Jul 2012, 01:15 AM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App