The EPF lesson
- How Huawei P20 Pro compares with Google Pixel 2 XL, Samsung Galaxy S9+ and Apple iPhone X
- Apple supplier AMS’s outlook spurs fears of weak iPhone X demand
- HPBOSE 12th result 2018 declared, check your board exam results on hpbose.org
- Modi-Xi summit as significant as Rajiv Gandhi-Xiaoping meet: Chinese official media
- Mahesh Babu’s ‘Bharat Ane Nenu’ storms domestic, overseas box office
The speed at which the government has dumped its proposal to partially tax withdrawals from the Employees’ Provident Fund tells us two things—the power of a small but vocal elite that is the biggest beneficiary of subsidies from this scheme, and the growing inability of the Narendra Modi government to stick to its guns.
Almost every expert agrees that the National Pension System is a far better way to create steady retirement pensions in a society where lifespans are increasing. It stands to reason that it should become more fiscally attractive than the EPF; untaxed bullet withdrawals from the latter are likely to be frittered away because of the old behavioural malaise of hyperbolic discounting.
That said, there is no doubt that the government could have done a better job explaining what it had set out to do. A basic mistake was announcing the policy change in the budget. It would have been better to build a consensus separately before making the change.