Governments must protect the rights of citizens, but bringing Internet platforms under state purview has the potential to undermine Internet freedom
The plea to the Supreme Court to bring in the government to oversee data-sharing on social networking sites and instant messaging services raises crucial issues. The petitioners argue that WhatsApp sharing data with its parent company Facebook violates constitutional freedoms and the government must frame a privacy law preventing corporate entities from exploiting user data for commercial gains.
This is a double-edged sword. Governments must protect the rights of citizens—but bringing Internet platforms under state purview has the potential to undermine Internet freedom. And Chief Justice J.S. Khehar noted that individuals willingly give up their freedoms when they agree to the terms and conditions set by social network and messaging services. But others argue that these services have become so ubiquitous that staying out of the network isn’t really a choice.
There are no easy answers here—only difficult compromises that lawmakers and citizens in India must grapple with, as their counterparts around the world are doing.
Editor's Picks »
- JSW Steel plans bid for ArcelorMittal’s Galati plant in Romanian
- NSE algo trading case: Sebi to take action against involved entities
- RBI asks banks to upgrade ATMs for greater security
- Zuckerberg on cusp of topping Buffett with Facebook at $200
- Swiggy becomes second unicorn after Zomato in India’s food-tech space
- Why Indian paint makers are shifting to water-based paints
- 2019 elections still some time away but defence stocks get the jitters
- Complan and Horlicks sale signals low energy in health drinks market
- With fall of the last dove, MPC minutes portend more than one RBI rate hike
- RITES IPO ticks the valuations box, but not the growth one