Tata-Mistry spat a litmus test for corporate governance
The role of directors on the boards of various Tata companies has also emerged as a decisive factor in the Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry battles
The messy battle within the Tata group is proving to be a litmus test for corporate governance—and especially the role of the directors on the boards of various operating companies.
The voting pattern in recent days has been interesting. The directors on the board of Indian Hotels have backed Cyrus Mistry. The directors on the board of Tata Motors have preferred to sit on the fence for now. And the directors on the board of Tata Global Beverages have voted to remove Mistry as chairman. The two sides will have to fight it out company by company.
As we have pointed out earlier, corporate governance in India is complicated because of the complex control structure in most Indian corporate groups—holding firms, investment companies and operating companies have stakes in one another. In the Tata case, a problem in the holding company has spilled over into operating companies with millions of shareholders. The ability of independent directors to vote with the interests of ordinary shareholders in mind will thus be crucial.
Also read | Tata Sons board meeting on Thursday
Editor's Picks »
- Take a loan against your mutual fund only if you really need it
- Patanjali seeing interest from electric vehicle, steel makers: Acharya Balkrishna
- How a strong portfolio can change a life
- Will homebuyers really benefit if they are financial creditors?
- India’s correlation with global markets approaches 10-year low
- Motherson Sumi continues to face margin pressure in foreign markets
- What the Warren Buffett indicator tells us about market valuations today
- Jet Airways lands with a thud in Q4 as fuel costs increase
- IBC amendments: Some dilutions, and a lot more speed
- Patanjali’s gambit is paying off in toothpaste wars