Europe’s darkness at noon3 min read . Updated: 14 Nov 2011, 11:16 PM IST
Europe’s darkness at noon
Europe’s darkness at noon
It may be hard to imagine that Europe’s crisis could worsen, but it just has. European Union (EU) leaders failed at their summit two weeks ago to produce anything of substance. China and Brazil are clearly reluctant to come to the rescue by providing a large injection of foreign cash. And the recent summit of the Group of Twenty countries in Cannes produced no agreement on steps that might have helped to resolve the crisis.
Then there was the collapse of the Greek government. The trigger may have been outgoing prime minister George Papandreou’s ill-advised decision to call for a referendum on the EU’s rescue package (which implies further severe austerity measures); but the fundamental problem is that a brutal recession made the government’s demise all but inevitable.
Even worse for financial stability, Papandreou’s announcement of a referendum provoked German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy to break an important taboo. Previously, European leaders had averred that the euro was forever, repeating at every turn that they would do whatever it took to hold the monetary union together. Last week, in a dangerous departure, Merkel and Sarkozy bluntly told the Greeks that it was up to them to decide whether they wanted to keep the euro.
Their statements were designed to beat Greek politicians into submission, and may have succeeded, at least for now. But they also opened the door to destabilizing speculation. The temptation to bet against continued Greek participation in the euro is now greater than ever. As investors place their bets, the balance sheets of Greek banks and the Greek government will deteriorate further, which could cause bearish expectations to become self-fulfilling.
The greater danger is that where Greece leads, Portugal and Italy will be forced to follow. Anyone who doubts this need only to think back to 1992, when the European Monetary System fell apart.
In September of that year, Bundesbank president Helmut Schlesinger made some reckless comments about how devaluations within Europe’s system of supposed stable exchange rates “cannot be ruled out". Schlesinger’s unguarded remarks signalled that Bundesbank was not willing to do whatever it took to preserve the system—a signal that encouraged investors to place massive bets against the British pound and Italian lira. The result was the collapse of Europe’s exchange rate mechanism.
If Merkel and Sarkozy are serious about preserving the euro, they will have to repair the damage caused by their reckless remarks. They should acknowledge that the only entity with the capacity to stabilize the situation is the European Central Bank (ECB). And they must give ECB the political cover that it needs to do what is required to preserve the system.
Specifically, ECB must do much more to support economic growth. Its decision to cut rates by 25 basis points at the first policy meeting under its new president, Mario Draghi, is the one ray of light in an otherwise darkening sky. But 25 basis points are a drop in the bucket. With Europe headed for recession, the danger of rising inflation is nil. Still, given German sensitivities, Merkel should use her bully pulpit to reassure her public.
More controversially, ECB needs to increase its purchases of Italian bonds. Unless yields on these bonds fall to German levels, there is no way that Italy’s debt arithmetic can be made to add up. But Draghi has indicated that he is reluctant to see ECB become a lender to governments. Reassuring the markets by adopting structural reforms, he has observed, is properly the responsibility of those governments, not of the central bank.
But structural reforms cannot be accomplished overnight. Italy needs time to put its pro-growth reforms in place. Not providing that time would sound the death knell for the euro.
Here’s where the political cover comes into play. Merkel and Sarkozy need to make the case that if the euro is to become a normal currency, Europe needs a normal central bank—one that does not merely target inflation like an automaton, but that also understands its responsibilities as a lender of last resort.
Meanwhile, Italy, now under the watchful eye of the International Monetary Fund, needs to move ahead with those pro-growth reforms in order to reassure ECB’s shareholders that the central bank’s bond purchases are not money losers.
If it does, maybe—just maybe— there will be reason to hope that the European project’s darkest hour is just before the dawn.
Barry Eichengreen is professor of economics and political science at the University of California, Berkeley
Comments are welcome at firstname.lastname@example.org