The GST Council now needs to ensure that India moves to the originally recommended GST design quickly—with wider coverage, fewer slabs and lower rates
The goods and services tax (GST) regime began on the wrong foot thanks to multiple rates that made little economic sense as well as onerous compliance requirements that have messed up the working capital cycles of smaller firms.
There is no doubt that the early version of GST continues to be far better than the indirect tax regime it has replaced. But neither can it be denied that GST Ver 1.0 falls short of the simple national value-added tax that was expected.
Against this backdrop, the changes to the GST structure that were announced last week are welcome, especially to pare the list of items taxed at the highest rate down to 50.
It is not clear whether this rationalization of indirect taxes is because of the fear of a voter backlash or confidence that the revenues that are coming in are stronger than expected. Either way, the finance ministers in the GST Council have done well. They now need to ensure that India moves to the originally recommended GST design quickly—with wider coverage, fewer slabs and lower rates.
Editor's Picks »
- Dr Reddy’s will have to wait to sell suboxone copy
- In pics: Isha Ambani-Anand Piramal wedding today, Antilla ready to welcome guests
- Urjit Patel’s resignation highlights risks to policy priorities: Fitch
- IndiGo New Year sale: Flight tickets from Rs 3,299 on overseas routes
- Rupee weakens past 72 per US dollar: 5 things to know
- Escorts: Japanese joint venture to hone growth in tractors
- HCL Tech’s acquisition of IBM products raises more questions than answers
- Investors ignore NMDC’s price cuts, and worry about its Donimalai iron ore mine instead
- Steel stocks get winter chill as China demand issues resurface
- Why Uday Kotak’s defiance is scaring his bank’s investors