Active Stocks
Thu Apr 18 2024 15:59:07
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 160.00 -0.03%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 280.20 2.13%
  1. NTPC share price
  2. 351.40 -2.19%
  1. Infosys share price
  2. 1,420.55 0.41%
  1. Wipro share price
  2. 444.30 -0.96%
Business News/ Opinion / Online-views/  Ourview | An incomplete audit story
BackBack

Ourview | An incomplete audit story

Ourview | An incomplete audit story

By Jayachandran/MintPremium

By Jayachandran/Mint

The recently released final report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on a few oil and gas exploration contracts provides an elaborate narrative of the transgressions committed by the explorers. It has also sought to retrieve lost ground.

In the case of Cairn Energy, it has disallowed costs of around $200 million that would otherwise dent the rent earned by the government. The petroleum ministry has concurred. But that hardly completes the story. And the lead is given by none other than the petroleum ministry itself: It says its technical arm, the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons (DGH), had recommended against allowing costs that were incurred in exploring parts of the block that had been relinquished to the government.

So, then, who allowed it? And, has the responsible official been penalized? For only such an action would effectively deter officials from squandering away public money.

By Jayachandran/Mint

RIL argued that it was so, citing seismic “photos". DGH, citing the contract, said nothing doing—physical verification of hydrocarbon presence is essential; this requires expensive wells to be drilled (each costing over $50 million). Not an easy task since the block extends over 7,000 sq. km; RIL had drilled wells in a radius of a mere 350 sq.?km.

That opinion, however, changed as soon as there was a change of guard at DGH. The issue was tossed up to the petroleum ministry in two conflicting DGH opinions. The ministry set up a committee to decide on the issue, headed by a senior civil servant at the ministry.

Rather than seeking the legal department’s view on an issue bearing immense financial implications or for that matter an independent technical view, the officer went along with the second DGH report that favoured RIL.

If RIL had lost the battle and wanted to explore the entire block, it would have had to bid out aggressively to secure the relinquished area in the reauction. For everyone knows the heightened prospects of finding oil and gas in the area around RIL’s wells. CAG has sought to correct this straying by the petroleum ministry, seeking to redraw the boundaries.

Did DGH fulfil its regulatory function? Tell us at views@livemint.com

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 13 Sep 2011, 09:33 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App