- Tata Steel-Bhushan Steel deal a sound start to the new bankruptcy framework
- In his 5th year, PM Modi needs to be a true pradhan sevak
- Decline of trade unions since the 1970s may have led to the rise in inequality
- 1,087 trillion reasons to worry about Japan
- The tragic story of civilian prime ministers in Pakistan
The abolition of the colonial tradition of presenting a separate railway budget was long overdue. Subsuming it in the Union budget, as will be done for the first time come Wednesday, is a welcome streamlining of the entire exercise. Importantly, by lowering its profile, it may also take some of the political pressure off it.
That is to be hoped for, at least. The railways require a number of capital-intensive reforms. For one, it must upgrade infrastructure and address personnel shortages in order to deal with a dismal safety record. Second, freight services—ideally, far more efficient than road transport—must be upgraded in order to capitalize on their natural advantages. And third, the quality of passenger travel must improve.
The appeal of populism meant that in the past, new trains were used to appeal to local constituencies while passenger fare rationalization was verboten. Here’s hoping Arun Jaitley keeps his promise to eschew populism for the railways.