BackThe stupidity of pushing Sanskrit
Trying to impose Sanskrit does a disservice to the language, and evokes the worst fears of many Indians, including people who voted for BJP
Premium
This whole German-Sanskrit mess, where does one begin when one wants to write about it? That it is completely unnecessary? That forcing children to study something will achieve nothing? That the extreme-Hindutva brigade lacks anything remotely resembling finesse? That this is just the sort of thing about the Sangh Parivar that turns reasonable Indians off? That these people, by trying to ramrod Sanskrit into the education system, are doing a great disservice both to a fine language and to the ancient Indic culture they are supposedly celebrating?
Where does one begin?
It’s not that a Bhatatiya Janata Party (BJP) led government is any worse than a Congress government when it comes to fingering around with the education system. When the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) was in power, human resources minister Kapil Sibal changed the Indian Institute of Technology entrance examination system for no reason at all. Delhi University, against all logic and widespread protest from teachers, extended the three-year undergraduate programme to four (a decision that has been overturned by the current government). Quite likely, introducing Sanskrit as a mandatory subject in the Kendriya Vidyalayas will have less of a negative impact than the two UPA moves I have mentioned, since it affects no one’s career prospects. But why do it at all?
And if you want to promote Sanskrit, why be so hamhanded that you actually end up hurting your own cause? Minister Smriti Irani’s Sanskrit campaign, as far as I can make out, has gone through the following stages:
• She announced that Sanskrit will replace German as third language in the central schools.
• She then said that this has to be done from the next term itself, not next year. This is, quite simply, pure undisguised bullying, without any concern for the disorientation and difficulties that 78,000 schoolchildren may face halfway through the academic year.
• Parents of some KV students filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court, challenging the imposition of Sanskrit. Irani then claimed that she was doing it only because it was unconstitutional for KVs to offer a foreign language as part of their curriculum. Well, here one must say that if she is correct, it should be investigated how the earlier government allowed the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sanghatan to enter into an agreement with German government agencies to introduce the language into the syllabus. However, is it really such a big issue? Why not allow children to study French, Mandarin, Spanish, Japanese, whatever they want to, as long as there are competent teachers?
• Irani then said that of course she was not banning the learning of German. Students could always take the language as a hobby course.
• A couple of days later, in an interview with PTI news agency, Irani complained that no one was understanding what she had been saying. Apparently, she had never said that Sanskrit be made compulsory. Students were free to take any Indian language as their third language and Sanskrit was just one among the many choices they had. This, of course, implies that everyone reporting what she had been saying till now had either been hard of hearing or delusional, or both.
More importantly, even what she was saying now meant nothing. Because she knows very well that while students currently studying German theoretically have the option of picking any modern Indian language as third language, it’s logistically impossible for KVs to fulfill students’ choices in this limited timeframe. The KV policy is that a language will be offered only if 15 or more students opt for it. But even if 19 students in a KV in Maharashtra say that they want to study Tamil, how will the school manage to hire good Tamil teachers so quickly? So all the students of German will perforce have to switch to Sanskrit, for which there are teachers available.
In the meantime, the weird and most regressive side of the Sangh Parivar has emerged in full flower. Uma Bharti has said that Sanskrit could, in the course of time, replace English as a link language for the country. This begs for a simple question: But why?
No one can accuse the Chinese government of being dumb, and it has been spending enormous amounts of money for almost two decades now on getting its countrymen to learn English. Knowledge of English is about the only—slim—advantage we Indians have over the Chinese (and a lot of other nationalities). Bharti’s thinking is just daft thinking.
Vishwa Hindu Parishad leader Ashok Singhal, who was unhappily lurking on the sidelines for quite some time, has now found something to get him back into the field. He wants Sanskrit to be made compulsory and has been quoted in the media saying: “One foreign language (English) is enough… Sanskrit is the language of our country. Everything was written in Sanskrit thousands of years ago. If you want to eliminate it, you want to eliminate this country."
First of all, with all due respect for Sanskrit, a mere fraction of Indians ever spoke Sanskrit. That is why the Buddha preached in Pali. In fact, there are many things that all Indians actually did thousands of years ago that you possibly wouldn’t want us to do today. For instance, all Indians wore garments of unstitched cloth. And all women went around bare-breasted.
But then, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and other such Sangh Parivar organisations have never been noted for scientific temper. By keeping on making absurd claims like we built flying machines and nuclear weapons thousands of years before the Wright brothers and the Manhattan Project scientists were born, they actually do a huge disservice to our ancient learnings and real discoveries.
By promoting Vedic mathematics, they obscure the fact that the 6th century astronomer-mathematician Brahmagupta developed the concept of zero, the foundation of all modern mathematics. By focusing on cow urine, they damage the credibility of ayurveda, which has thousands of medicine formulations that Western Big Pharma is dying to patent.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
It is the same with extreme-Hindutva claims about Sanskrit. It is a similar disservice they do to the language when they go around insisting that the world’s top computer scientists have said that Sanskrit is the ideal computer programming language. (This claim hasn’t yet been made in the present controversy, but I am sure that someone will come out of the woodwork soon hollering about this.) Dear sirs, no scientist with any sense has ever said that. What they have noted is that Sanskrit is a remarkably logical language in its structure, perhaps the closest that any human language comes to computer languages, in the sense that all vocabulary and expression are derived precisely step by step in a logical hierarchy from some basic root words. This is the fundamental characteristic of all computer languages, and this is something that Sanskrit shares with them—up to a large extent.
However, these are still arguments in a theoretical space. At the practical level, I wish to make three points.
One, to know and appreciate ancient Indic wisdom, one does not have to learn Sanskrit. Just as, to read Aristotle or Plato, one need not know ancient Greek. Most great Sanskrit texts are available in English translation and, I assume, in most Indian languages. The Sangh Parivar would serve its own cultural cause far better if, instead of pushing Sanskrit down everyone’s throat, it tried to ensure that the texts are translated better, and made more accessible in more languages, Indian or foreign, in every way—in terms of availability, price and so on.
Do spread the knowledge of the language too, but by encouraging students to learn, not by imposing it on them. Do it with a positive energy, not based on arguments that reek of rancour and grievance and an exclusionary mindset.
Two, forcing students to learn something does not work. It goes against every enlightened concept of education and individual choice. And it can only ensure that the student develops an antipathy for the subject. Sure, there are some things everyone should learn: the three Rs—reading, writing and arithmetic. But just as everyone does not have to know calculus (the core principles of which were quite possibly developed by Indian mathematician Madhava three centuries before Newton and Leibniz), everyone does not need to know Sanskrit. One can be steeped in Indian culture and even spirituality, without knowing the language. For instance, Ramakrishna Paramhansa did not know Sanskrit.
Three, just having children study Sanskrit for a few years in school will achieve nothing. I studied French for four years, from Class IX to XII, and as far as I recall, I did very well in the subject in both my Boards (X and XII), perhaps scoring more than 90 out of 100. Yet, today, I remember hardly anything of what I learnt, simply because I studied it as one of many subjects that I had to take examinations in, and once I cracked the exams, my relationship with French ended. However, I did have a few classmates who continued with French, graduated in the language, and have built careers around or intrinsically linked to it. These were people who were really interested in the language.
The number of children who would retain their knowledge of Sanskrit or pursue it beyond school level will remain unchanged whether it is an optional or a compulsory subject. If it is made mandatory, you will only be curtailing a student’s freedom and diminishing her joy of learning. (Similarly, a few years of learning German in school is hardly going to turn Indian children Germanic. Nor are they going to land plum jobs in that country.)
I do believe that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a pragmatic man. I hope that he sees that this whole commotion is totally unnecessary, and will not help ground Indians in their culture. There are far more important issues that the government and the human resources ministry should be spending their energies on. This Sanskrit sloganeering evokes the worst fears of many Indians about a BJP government, a majority of whom may even have voted for the party in the Lok Sabha elections.
Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!
