Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 15:59:33
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.90 2.00%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 1,095.75 1.08%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,448.20 0.52%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 428.55 0.13%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 277.05 2.21%
Business News/ Opinion / China’s slow-growth opportunity
BackBack

China’s slow-growth opportunity

For China, accepting lower growth provides a crucial opportunity to support sustainable development

Photo: AFP Premium
Photo: AFP

After four disappointing years, Chinese economists have realized that slowing gross domestic product (GDP) growth—from a post-crisis peak of 12.8% in 2010 to about 7% today—is mainly structural, rather than cyclical. In other words, China’s potential growth rate has settled onto a significantly lower plateau. While the country should be able to avoid a hard landing, it can expect annual growth to remain at 6-7% over the next decade. But this may not necessarily be bad news.

One might ask why GDP in China, where per capita income recently surpassed $7,000, is set to grow so much more slowly than Japan’s did from 1956 to 1970, when the Japanese economy, with per capita income starting from about $7,000, averaged 9.7% annual growth. The answer lies in potential growth.

Whereas, according to Japan’s central bank, Japanese labour productivity grew by more than 10% annually, on average, from 1960 to 1973, Chinese productivity has been declining steadily in recent years, from 11.8% in 2001-08 to 8.8% in 2008-12, and to 7.4% in 2011-12. Japan’s labour supply (measured in labour hours) was also growing during that period, by more than 3% annually. By contrast, China’s working-age population has been shrinking, by more than three million annually, since 2012—a trend that will, with a 4-6-year lag, cause labour-supply growth to decline, and even turn negative. Given the difficulty of reversing these trends, it is difficult to imagine how China could maintain a growth rate anywhere close to 10% for another decade, despite its low per capita income. But there is more.

As the Japanese economist Ryuichiro Tachi has pointed out, Japan also benefited from a high savings rate and a low capital coefficient (the ratio of capital to output) of less than 1. Though a precise comparison is difficult, there is no doubt that China’s capital coefficient is much higher, implying a larger gap between the growth rate of capital intensity (the total amount of capital needed per dollar of revenue) and that of labour productivity.

At times, a high investment rate can offset a high capital coefficient’s negative impact on growth. But China’s investment rate is already too high, accounting for almost half of GDP. With capital intensity increasing significantly faster than labour productivity in China, the inefficiency of investment is clear. In this context, increased investment would only exacerbate the problem.

Making matters worse, China’s corporate debt is already the highest in the world, both in absolute terms and relative to GDP. In this context, increasing investment would not only reduce capital efficiency further; it would also heighten the risk implied by companies’ high leverage ratios.

With all major indicators suggesting a significant decline in China’s growth potential, China’s leaders must accept the reality of lower growth and adjust their priorities accordingly. Succumbing to the temptation of massive monetary and fiscal stimulus, such as that pursued in the wake of the global economic crisis, would not only fail to boost growth in a sustainable way; it would actually undermine growth and stability in the medium to long term.

On this issue, Japan has some useful lessons to offer. In the 1970s, recognizing the inevitability of a slowdown, Japan shelved its ambitious plan to remodel the Japanese archipelago. Policymakers shut down energy-intensive factories in the heavy chemical industry, promoted innovation and took steps to address air and water pollution. As a result, the quality of Japan’s growth improved considerably, even as its rate fell by nearly half in the decade after the oil shock in 1973.

The good news is that China’s leaders seem intent on adopting a similar approach, including avoidance of monetary and fiscal expansion, unless growth seems set to collapse. Indeed, at the recently concluded National People’s Congress, Premier Li Keqiang affirmed the authorities’ 7% target for GDP growth this year, while reiterating the importance of deepening reform and carrying out structural adjustments.

For China, accepting lower growth provides a crucial opportunity to support sustainable development. If China’s leaders stay the course of reform and rebalancing, the entire global economy will be better off. ©2015/PROJECT SYNDICATE

Yu Yongding, former president of the China Society of World Economics and director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, served on the Monetary Policy Committee of the People’s Bank of China from 2004 to 2006.

Comments are welcome at otherviews@livemint.com

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 14 Apr 2015, 05:53 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App