Obama, Karzai ink strategic Afghan pact6 min read . Updated: 02 May 2012, 11:23 PM IST
Obama, Karzai ink strategic Afghan pact
Obama, Karzai ink strategic Afghan pact
Bagram Airbase, Afghanistan: US President Barack Obama marked the anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s death with a speedy trip to Afghanistan, signing a strategic pact with Kabul on Wednesday and delivering an election-year message to Americans that the war is winding down.
Shortly after arriving under the cover of darkness, Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai signed a strategic partnership agreement at the Afghan leader’s palace that sets out a long-term US role in Afghanistan, including aid and advisers.
The deal may provide Afghans with reassurances that they will not be abandoned when most NATO combat troops leave as planned in 2014. For Obama, it was an opportunity to draw a line under a war started by his predecessor, George W. Bush, in response to the 11 September, 2001, attacks on the United States but which is now widely unpopular at home.
“My fellow Americans, we have traveled through more than a decade under the dark cloud of war. Yet here, in the pre-dawn darkness of Afghanistan, we can see the light of a new day on the horizon," Obama said in a televised address to the American people against the backdrop of armored vehicles and a US flag.
“As we emerge from a decade of conflict abroad and economic crisis at home, it’s time to renew America," he said. “This time of war began in Afghanistan, and this is where it will end."
Obama visited with troops during a stay of roughly six hours in the country and emphasized the demise of al Qaeda leader bin Laden, an event that his re-election campaign has touted as one of his most important achievements in office. Obama left Afghanistan on Air Force One shortly after delivering his speech.
“Not only were we able to drive al Qaeda out of Afghanistan, but slowly and systematically we have been able to decimate the ranks of al Qaeda, and a year ago we were able to finally bring Osama bin Laden to justice," Obama said to cheers.
But even as he asserted in his speech that there was a “clear path" to fulfilling the US mission in Afghanistan and made his strongest claim yet that the defeat of al Qaeda was “within reach," he warned of further hardship ahead.
What does the future hold for Afghanistan one year after the death of Osama bin Laden? And what will it all mean for India? We ask expert C. Uday Bhaskar.
“I recognize that many Americans are tired of war. ... But we must finish the job we started in Afghanistan and end this war responsibly," he said at Bagram airbase outside of Kabul, where only months ago thousands of Afghans rioted after US troops accidentally burned copies of the Koran, the Muslim holy book.
The incident plunged already tense relations to their lowest point in years.
While speaking in broad terms of “difficult days ahead," Obama did not address some of the thorniest challenges.
Those include corruption in Karzai’s weak government, the unsteadiness of Afghan forces in the face of a resilient Taliban insurgency, and Washington’s strained ties with Pakistan where US officials see selective cooperation in cracking down on militants fueling cross-border violence.
Those risks, along with the tactical gains US commanders see in parts of the country, were laid out in a new Pentagon report released on Tuesday.
Hours after Obama left Afghanistan, a suicide bomber rammed a car full of explosives into a blast wall in Kabul in an assault against a housing complex popular with Westerners, killing at least six people, Afghan authorities said.
Kabul Police chief Ayub Salangi told Reuters one of those killed was a Gurkha guard, while the rest were civilian passersby, Salangi said. A second blast struck the area later, a Reuters witness said.
Earlier, Obama met Karzai at his walled garden palace in Kabul, where they signed the Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA). “By signing this document, we close the last 10 years and open a new season of equal relations," Karzai said after the meeting.
Within Afghanistan, the palace signing ceremony was aimed at sending a message to the Taliban and other groups that they cannot wait out 130,000 foreign troops and retake power.
The agreement does not specify whether a reduced number of U.S. troops, possibly special forces, and advisers will remain after NATO’s 2014 withdrawal deadline. That will be dealt with in a separate status-of-forces agreement still being worked out.
As he fights for re-election in a campaign dominated by economic issues, Obama is seeking to portray his foreign policy record as a success.
His campaign team has made bin Laden’s death a key part of that argument, and the president’s visit to the country where militants hatched the 11 September attacks on the United States reinforces that message.
It also opens him up to criticism from Republicans, who say Obama has politicized bin Laden’s death.
Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee to oppose Obama in the Nov. 6 US presidential election, said he was pleased Obama had returned to Afghanistan.
“Our troops and the American people deserve to hear from our president about what is at stake in this war," Romney said in a statement released as Obama flew home. “Success in Afghanistan is vital to our nation’s security. It would be a tragedy for Afghanistan and a strategic setback for America if the Taliban returned to power and once again created a sanctuary for terrorists."
Romney has criticized Obama’s handling of Afghanistan, saying the timeline for a withdrawal will only embolden militants and could leave the country vulnerable to a return to power of the Taliban, which ruled Afghanistan prior to the US-led invasion.
Obama pushed back, insisting a “clear timeline" was needed to meet limited U.S. goals in the conflict - primarily counterterrorism - and allow Afghans to assert sovereignty.
Obama’s campaign has questioned whether Romney would have made the same decision to authorize the raid that killed bin Laden. On Tuesday in New York, Romney said he would have made the same call and criticised Obama for making the issue political.
Politics aside, a senior US official cautioned that no matter what pacts are signed, “Afghanistan is still going to be the third poorest country in the world."
Skepticism is shared by the European Union’s ambassador to Kabul, who said earlier on Tuesday that Western aid that has been poured into Afghanistan will have a limited impact as long as governance remained poor and corruption widespread.
Afghanistan’s government does not seem to grasp the magnitude of major challenges just two years ahead of the pullout, Vygaudas Usackas told Reuters in an interview.
Large parts of central Kabul surrounding Karzai’s palace were locked down for the Obama’s arrival, with police sealing off streets around the city’s walled Green Zone, home to most embassies and NATO’s Afghanistan headquarters.
Insurgents staged coordinated attacks in the same area only weeks before, paralyzing the capital’s center and diplomatic area for 18 hours. The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attacks, but US and Afghan officials blamed the militant Haqqani network.
After a US troop surge that Obama ordered in late 2009, US and NATO forces have managed to weaken Taliban militants, but the movement is far from defeated.
Obama plans to host NATO leaders in Chicago on 20-21May for a summit to discuss the specifics of the troop withdrawals and look at ways to ensure that Afghanistan does not collapse into civil war when foreign combat forces leave.
The Obama administration is expected to struggle in securing its desired level of contributions for Afghan security forces from its cash-strapped European allies.
Obama said that after his surge troops are withdrawn this fall, “reductions will continue at a steady pace, with more of our troops coming home," suggesting that he would not keep the force at a plateau level of 68,000 for one or two more fighting seasons as some generals might prefer.