SC rejects DMRC plea against Rs60 crore interest payment to Reliance Infra unit
While dismissing the appeal, Supreme Court gave DMRC one week’s time to make the payment to Delhi Airport Metro
- Donald Trump says US team in North Korea planning summit with Kim Jong Un
- Women at the forefront of anti-Sterlite protests
- Kerala: Chengannur bypoll today, CPM, Congress gear up to thwart BJP
- Why Palghar bypoll is important for BJP in Maharashtra
- Chandrababu Naidu sounds poll bugle for 2019 elections, tears into BJP
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal by the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) challenging release of Rs60 crore payable as interest to Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd (DAMEPL), a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure Ltd, a part of Anil Ambani’s Reliance Group.
While dismissing the appeal, the court gave DMRC one week’s time to make the payment.
The court was hearing an appeal against a 30 May order of the Delhi high court, directing DMRC to pay the interest amount to Reliance Infra unit DAMEPL.
DAMEPL had approached the Delhi high court seeking early payment of an arbitration award it had won against the DMRC for termination of concession agreements for the metro express project.
On 11 May, an arbitral award amounting to Rs2,950 crore was passed in favour of DAMPEL. The total compensation (including interest) would amount to Rs4,670 crore.
The plea was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for payment of Rs3,502 crore, which constitutes 75% of the total award amount.
DAMEPL claimed that under the 5 September 2015 guidelines issued by Niti Aayog, public sector undertakings (PSUs) were to pay 75% of the award amount even if they proposed to challenge the arbitral award.
Applicability of the guidelines was opposed by DMRC, which told the court that the 90-day period to challenge the award had not lapsed.
Reliance Group companies have sued HT Media Ltd, Mint’s publisher, and nine others in the Bombay high court over a 2 October 2014 front-page story that they have disputed. HT Media is contesting the case.
Editor's Picks »
- Take a loan against your mutual fund only if you really need it
- Patanjali seeing interest from electric vehicle, steel makers: Acharya Balkrishna
- How a strong portfolio can change a life
- Will homebuyers really benefit if they are financial creditors?
- India’s correlation with global markets approaches 10-year low
- Motherson Sumi continues to face margin pressure in foreign markets
- What the Warren Buffett indicator tells us about market valuations today
- Jet Airways lands with a thud in Q4 as fuel costs increase
- IBC amendments: Some dilutions, and a lot more speed
- Patanjali’s gambit is paying off in toothpaste wars