Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 15:59:33
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.90 2.00%
  1. ICICI Bank share price
  2. 1,095.75 1.08%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,448.20 0.52%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 428.55 0.13%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 277.05 2.21%
Business News/ News / World/  South Africa to withdraw from International Criminal Court
BackBack

South Africa to withdraw from International Criminal Court

South Africa last year announced its intention to leave after the ICC criticized it for ignoring a court order to arrest Sudanese president Omar Hassan al-Bashir,

The move would take effect one year after notice was formally received by UN secretary general. Photo: BloombergPremium
The move would take effect one year after notice was formally received by UN secretary general. Photo: Bloomberg

Pretoria: South Africa said on Friday it was quitting the International Criminal Court (ICC) because membership conflicted with diplomatic immunity laws, dealing a new blow to the struggling court and angering the political opposition.

Pretoria last year announced its intention to leave after the ICC criticized it for ignoring a court order to arrest Sudanese president Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who is accused of genocide and war crimes, when he visited. Bashir has denied the accusations.

The ICC was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement puts new pressure on the world’s first permanent war crimes court, which has had to fight off allegations of pursuing a neo-colonial agenda in Africa, where all but one of its 10 investigations have been based. Burundi has already said it plans to leave and Kenya’s parliament is considering following suit.

Justice minister Michael Masutha told reporters in Pretoria that the government would draft a bill to repeal South Africa’s adoption of the ICC’s Rome Statute in order to preserve its ability to conduct active diplomatic relations, and had given formal notice.

He said the statute conflicted with South Africa’s Diplomatic Immunities and Privileges Act, but that the government remained committed to the fight against impunity.

‘Unconstitutional and irrational’

A document seen by Reuters at the United Nations on Thursday showed the move would take effect one year after notice was formally received by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

The document was signed by the international relations minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane and dated 19 October.

James Selfe, a senior executive at the main opposition Democratic Alliance, said in a statement that the party would file a court application on Friday to set aside the plans “on the grounds that it is unconstitutional, irrational and procedurally flawed".

The International Criminal Court, which sits in The Hague and has 124 member states, is the first legal body with permanent international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

But it has secured only five substantive verdicts in its 14-year history, all of them on African suspects, and several African countries have expressed concern that the continent is being picked on.

A high-profile attempt to try Kenya’s sitting president, Uhuru Kenyatta, and his deputy, William Ruto, over an outbreak of post-election violence failed amid diplomatic lobbying and allegations of witness intimidation.

Adan Duale, leader of the majority in the Kenyan parliament, said impetus was building there to pass a bill on quitting the ICC that has been slowly making its way through the assembly. “The bill is due for a second reading and people are asking for it to be given priority next week," he said.

Burundi to leave

Burundi’s parliament voted last week to leave the court, although the United Nations has not yet been officially notified.

Masutha said Pretoria would now drop its appeal to the constitutional court against a ruling that the state had made an error in letting Bashir leave the country.

In June 2015, Bashir, who was in Johannesburg for an African Union summit, was allowed to leave even though a court had ordered that he be kept in South Africa until the end of a hearing on whether he should be detained under a global arrest warrant.

The high court ruled that he should have been arrested to face genocide charges at the ICC because, as a signatory of the Rome Statute, Pretoria was obliged to implement arrest warrants.

The government lost an appeal at the Supreme Court in March and the appeal to the Constitutional Court was its last chance of overturning the ruling.

Jeremy Sarkin, professor of law at the University of South Africa, said the move to quit the ICC would be challenged by civil society.

“I am sure there are a range of organizations who will take up this particular matter that is in violation of our constitution, in violation of South African law and in violation of the decisions of the courts over the last few years about South Africa’s international obligations," he said. Reuters

With assisstance from Wendell Roelf, Toby Sterling and Katharine Houreld

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More Less
Published: 21 Oct 2016, 05:42 PM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App