IL&FS defaulted on a series of debt obligations, triggering a crisis in the shadow banking sector as banks and mutual funds cut their exposure to non-bank lenders (Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint)
IL&FS defaulted on a series of debt obligations, triggering a crisis in the shadow banking sector as banks and mutual funds cut their exposure to non-bank lenders (Photo: Aniruddha Chowdhury/Mint)

IL&FS: Sebi looks to levy higher penalties on three rating agencies

  • The low penalty of 25 lakh each on three rating firms in the IL&FS case had raised eyebrows due to the grave lapses
  • Fresh notices were sent to ICRA, India Ratings and Research and Credit Analysis and Research

Mumbai: The markets regulator has sent fresh notices to rating companies for failing to warn bond investors of Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd (IL&FS) in time about the scam at the shadow lender, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said, after its board disapproved of the low penalty imposed on them on 26 December.

A sizeable section of the board of Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), including chairman Ajay Tyagi, felt the penalty was rather low, following which fresh notices were sent to ICRA Ltd, India Ratings and Research Pvt. Ltd and Credit Analysis and Research Ltd (CARE), the people said on condition of anonymity.

In response to exchange queries Care ratings on Monday later clarified that they are in receipt of Sebi showcause notice for enhancing penalties.

The relatively low penalty of 25 lakh each on the three companies had raised eyebrows, given the seriousness of the lapses. The agencies had assigned IL&FS the highest rating of AAA before the default in September 2018, even though its unit had defaulted in June of that year.

IL&FS defaulted on a series of debt obligations, triggering a crisis in the shadow banking sector as banks and mutual funds cut their exposure to non-bank lenders. In turn, non-banks restricted lending for purchases of cars, two-wheelers and consumer durables, hitting demand and worsening India’s economic slowdown.

“The Sebi board has found the conduct of these rating agencies grave enough to warrant a fresh look at penal action," said a senior regulatory official, one of the two people cited earlier. “It is a rare instance when Sebi uses its extraordinary powers under Section 15(I) of Sebi Act to review penalties imposed by its adjudicating officer."

Under Section 15(I), the Sebi board can call for and examine records of proceedings if it considers the orders passed by the adjudicating officer erroneous and not in the interest of securities markets. After examining the matter, the Sebi board can enhance the quantum of penalty imposed. However, such orders cannot be passed without giving the market entities concerned an opportunity to be heard.

Emails sent to India Ratings and CARE were not answered immediately. ICRA informed stock exchanges that it had received the notice.

The Sebi board’s view of the conduct of rating agencies is a marked departure from earlier practices. In previous instances of lapses by rating agencies, Sebi either tightened the regulatory provisions or allowed the agencies to settle the matter through its consent mechanism.

In the case of the IL&FS ratings, Sebi had rejected the settlement applications filed by the rating agencies in June and July last year. The consent plea would have otherwise allowed them to settle the lapses against a fee without admission of guilt. The IL&FS default had left a 99,354 crore hole in the financial system, which is the amount owed by IL&FS and its subsidiaries to its lenders.

After the default on payment obligations in September 2018, the rating of IL&FS and its subsidiaries’ paper was downgraded sharply and abruptly, from high investment grade (AA+ in some cases) to default or junk.

The Sebi adjudicating officer, in his 26 December order, had found the rating agencies guilty of excessively relying on assertions of the IL&FS management, not applying independent professional assessment, getting comfort from the parent company and not noticing disparities in public disclosures made by IL&FS.

Close
×
My Reads Logout