Reliance withdraws “inadvertent” application for Operation Sindoor trademark

Reliance proposes to use the trademark for entertainment purposes, including production, presentation and distribution of audio, video, or still and moving images. (Image: Mint)
Reliance proposes to use the trademark for entertainment purposes, including production, presentation and distribution of audio, video, or still and moving images. (Image: Mint)
Summary

Reliance had originally applied to trademark ‘Operation Sindoor’ , saying it would cover entertainment purposes, but withdrew it later saying the application had been filed inadvertently by a junior executive without authorisation.

New Delhi: Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) applied for but later withdrew its application for a trademark for “Operation Sindoor", the codename for India’s strike against terrorist bases in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

Jio Studios, a unit of Reliance Industries, said in a statement on Thursday afternoon that the trademark application had been filed inadvertently by a junior person without authorisation. Reliance Industries has no intention of trademarking Operation Sindoor, a phrase which is now a part of the national consciousness as an evocative symbol of Indian bravery.

Reliance had applied for the word-type trademark under Class 41 on 7 May, the day of the military operation, information from the commerce ministry's trademark search portal showed.

The company’s media and entertainment division offers news, entertainment, sports, movies, and live entertainment across various content formats.

Reliance Industries and all its stakeholders are incredibly proud of Operation Sindoor, which came about in response to a Pakistan-sponsored terrorist attack in Pahalgam, the company said on Thursday. Operation Sindoor is the proud achievement of our brave Armed Forces in India's uncompromising fight against the evil of terrorism, it said.

Reliance stands fully in support of our government and armed forces in this fight against terrorism. Our commitment to the motto of 'INDIA FIRST' remains unwavering, it said.

A Class 41 trademark would provide the holder with the rights to exclusively use the word-type trademark. Reliance proposed to use it for entertainment purposes, including production, presentation and distribution of audio, video, or still and moving images and data containing the trademark, according to the goods and services description in the application.

The trademark holder would be allowed to use it in publishing services including electronic publishing services, organisation, production and presentation of shows, competitions, games, concerts, exhibitions and events, among other things.

Also Read | Operation Sindoor: India on high alert for cyber attacks

The status of the application was "Formalities Chk Pass" as of 8 May morning, indicating that no action has been taken by the trademark registry as yet, according to legal practitioners. The status means the applicant has submitted information and documents correctly and has cleared the formalities check.

There are three other applicants for the trademark in the same class, according to information on the trademark search portal. They are Mukesh Chetram Agrawal, based in Mumbai, Group Captain Kamal Singh Oberh (Retd) in Jammu, and Alok Kothari from New Delhi.

The trademark application had triggered public criticism on social media sites.

"We hereby withdraw our application no. 6994264 in class 41 filed for the mark Operation Sindoor," Reliance said in a letter to the registrar of trademarks dated 8 May. "You are requested to take the withdrawal letter on record and pass the order treating the application as withdrawn."

Registration process

In securing a trademark, the registry examines applications for any existing use of the trademark. The registry may raise queries regarding the mark's usage and whether there are any similar prior marks. If the queries are resolved, the registry will accept the mark.

If no queries are raised, the mark will be accepted and published in the weekly trademark watch journal of the government. After this, the mark is opened to public scrutiny for four months, when trademark owners may raise complaints if the newly accepted trademark is similar to their mark.

Following this, in case there are no complaints, the trademark is registered.

"The trademark filing of Operation Sindoor, though procedurally valid, must be carefully examined by the Trademark Registry under the Trade Marks Act, 1999," said Aditi Gehlot, a Pune-based independent intellectual property expert. “If the name implies government affiliation or resembles official campaigns, it may be barred under Section 9(2)(b) and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. Public deception and misuse of government-like identifiers are key concerns. The registry must ensure such filings do not mislead or violate public policy."

Also Read | Operation Sindoor: Indian highways ready to support IAF with alternative runways

According to Suvarna Nilakh, associate professor at ILS Law College and an expert on intellectual property rights, the registration of trademarks normally takes 18-24 months, but applicants may expedite the process by applying to the registry. 

"While granting word-type trademarks, the registry does a thorough examination and looks for distinctiveness as well as similarities with existing trademarks. In the case of Operation Sindoor, does it have distinctiveness will be the first question, " said Nilakh.

A legal expert said on condition of anonymity that it is quite common for brands, studios and producers to try and register titles in order to latch on to topical trends. 

After the 14 February 2019 Pulwama attack, titles such as Pulwama Pulwama: The Surgical Strike, War Room, Hindustan Hamara Hai, Pulwama Terror Attack, The Attacks of Pulwama, With Love, From India, and ATS - One Man Show were registered. In the early 2000s, Parle had sought a trademark for and brought out a range called 20-20 Cookies to coincide with the launch of the T20 cricket format.

"There is usually no government objection to such trademarks, other than anything deemed obscene or inciteful to religion," the legal expert said.

Previous attacks

An application by Sonu Kishanlal Jain dated 15 January 2018 for a Class 41 trademark for "SURGICAL STRIKE The Secret Mission of India" was refused by the trademark registry, the commerce ministry's portal showed. The application was made after India’s retaliatory strike in response to the 2016 Uri terrorist attack.

The defence ministry said in a statement at 1:44 am on 7 May that Indian armed forces had targeted nine terrorist sites in the region under “Operation Sindoor." The strike followed the terrorist incident of 22 April in Pahalgam in India's northernmost region, where terrorists killed 26 individuals, according to the defence ministry.

Also Read | India ranks among top 10 globally for patents, trademarks, industrial designs

"We are living up to the commitment that those responsible for the attack will be held accountable," the ministry said.

India has previously retaliated against such terror attacks. After the 2016 Uri terrorist attack, which took the lives of 19 Indian soldiers, the government launched a surgical strike against strategic targets in the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir region.

In 2017, a movie was announced based on India's retaliation. Titled Uri: The Surgical Strike, it released in 2019.

Catch all the Corporate news and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
more

topics

Read Next Story footLogo