How the US lost its place as the world’s manufacturing powerhouse

U.S. manufacturing declined as services rose; tariffs unlikely to fully reverse the trend. (Image: Bloomberg)
U.S. manufacturing declined as services rose; tariffs unlikely to fully reverse the trend. (Image: Bloomberg)

Summary

President Trump says his tariff plan will restore American manufacturing might but economists are skeptical.

A Diego Rivera mural in Detroit depicts industrial workers in the American automaking capital.

In the 1950s, around 35% of private-sector jobs in the U.S. were in manufacturing. Today, there are 12.8 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S., an amount equal to 9.4% of those private-sector jobs.

President Trump says his sweeping tariff regime is aimed at bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. Economists are skeptical that tariffs could make that a reality, and worry that the damage they create will outweigh any benefits.

To understand whether restoring manufacturing to the U.S. is possible, it helps to first understand how the U.S. lost its place as the world’s manufacturing powerhouse.

The rise of U.S. manufacturing

America’s rise to becoming a global manufacturing juggernaut was driven by a confluence of factors.

In the early 1900s, the U.S. pioneered the use of interchangeable parts and organizing factors for mass production. World War II prompted a massive increase in manufacturing capacity, while also devastating competitors, points out Case Western Reserve University economist Susan Helper.

In the postwar years, more Americans joined the middle class, driving jumps in spending on long-lasting durable goods, like the cars and appliances for their newly purchased homes. America was America’s best customer for manufactured goods.

Many of these goods were high tech for the time, such as dishwashers, televisions and jets, often brought about by the host of innovations developed during the war. Making them in America, as opposed to some other country, made sense because staying on the leading edge required research and development teams working closely with the factory floor.

It helped, too, that thanks to the high-school education movement that began in the early 20th century, the U.S. had the most educated workforce in the world.

Services take the wheel

After the 1950s, manufacturing’s role in the U.S. economy began to slip. Some of this came about merely because Americans were becoming more affluent, and devoting more of their spending to services, such as travel, restaurants and medical care.

“You get richer, you can only buy so many cars, and you start buying services," explained Helper.

The jobs followed the spending, with more people going to work for service-sector employers such as hotels, banks, law firms and hospitals. There were ups and downs with recessions and recoveries, but from the mid-1960s through the early 1980s, manufacturing employment essentially leveled off, as services jobs grew and grew.

A North Carolina textile mill in 1960, when U.S. manufacturing was still dominant.

Under the hood, there were also shifts in where many of the nondurable goods Americans bought, such as clothing, were made. A lot of production shifted to states in the South, where labor costs were lower.

Around this time, less developed parts of the world, where labor costs were much lower, began dialing up manufacturing of nondurable goods in Latin America and Asia. The U.S. started importing more and more of those items. Over time, the same thing happened with light durable items, such as blenders.

China shock

In the 1980s, things began to change. American manufacturers of nondurable goods had an increasingly difficult time competing with countries where labor costs were lower. That intensified in the 1990s, in part as a result of the North American Free Trade Agreement lowering duties on Mexican goods.

There were also job losses at steel producers after developing countries such as South Korea built up their steel industries and left the world awash in excess capacity, points out Susan Houseman, an economist at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

But what happened in the 1980s and 1990s pales in comparison to what happened after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, opening its country to foreign investment and gaining access to global markets.

“All of a sudden we have substantial production capacity in a low-wage country, and that was a major shift," said Harvard University economist Gordon Hanson.

The U.S. had faced import competition from other countries before, but never one that dwarfed its population. And it came on the scene much faster than places like Japan had. In 1999, the value of Chinese goods exports came to only about a tenth of U.S.’s—less than Sweden’s. In 2008, it would surpass the U.S. as the world’s top exporter of goods.

Manufacturers of low-tech items such as furniture and small household appliances, in particular, suffered. Hanson, with David Autor and David Dorn, documented how the influx of inexpensive Chinese goods afflicted manufacturing communities in the South and Midwest, hurting workers. They called it the China Shock, and the name has stuck.

Where we are now

As China produced more and more stuff, America became even more adept at producing services.

Many of these can’t be traded globally: Somebody in London can’t easily go to a dentist in San Diego. But some, like software and other intellectual property items, can. In 2023, the U.S. exported $24 billion in advertising services, for example.

The U.S. now exports in excess of Justin.Lahart@wsj.com

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
more

topics

MINT SPECIALS