While Airtel wants IUC to stay for 3 more years, Voda Idea, BSNL urge Trai to reconsider 1 Jan deadline
JIo believes that the rethink to scrap IUC was unwarranted, arbitrary and anti-poor
NEW DELHI :
More cracks have emerged in the already divided telecom sector with Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd in favour of scrapping interconnect usage charge (IUC) from next year, while Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Idea and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd, or BSNL, opposing the move.
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) had recently floated a fresh consultation paper to see if there was a need to revise the date for scrapping IUC from 1 January 2020, given the continuing imbalance in inter-operator traffic.
Airtel and Vodafone Idea, which are currently battling shrinking revenue, thanks to Jio’s cut-throat tariffs, have welcomed Trai’s regulatory rethink.
Jio, however, said it believes this rethink to scrap IUC was unwarranted, arbitrary and anti-poor, and not only affects the credibility of the authority, but also sabotages the government’s Digital India mission.
“We firmly recommend that the applicable date for Bill and Keep regime be moved by at least three years," Airtel said in its comments on Trai’s consultation paper.
Under the Bill and Keep regime, operators do not pay any charge to each other for receiving calls on their network. Simply put, Bill and Keep means scrapping IUC.
IUC, at 6 paise per minute, is levied by mobile networks handling incoming calls from rival networks.
Scrapping IUC, or reducing it, would benefit Jio, which has more outgoing traffic than incoming calls. Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea earn a portion of their revenue from IUC as their incoming traffic is higher than outgoing.
Airtel has backed the extension as it believes that traffic symmetry has not been achieved. Vodafone Idea, too, has said in its comments that there was a need to extend the applicable date to move to a zero-IUC regime and, wherever Bill and Keep exists, it is based on mutual agreement among operators when there is symmetry in traffic.
However, Jio has alleged that perfect traffic symmetry is statistically impossible and Trai’s rethink will result in “protectionism, which is bound to result into technology stagnation". This, Jio said, will jeopardize the government’s Digital India programme.
On Monday, Trai uploaded the submissions made by operators on its website. In its comments to the regulator, Jio said if the authority does not scrap IUC, there will be little incentive for mobile service providers to invest in technology migration as long as the returns are assured to them in the form of this subsidy.
Meanwhile, Airtel and Vodafone Idea have said many customers in India still remain on legacy networks. “The projections by GSMA for India also predict that 12-13% of customers will continue to be on 2G handsets till 2025," Airtel said.
In September 2017, Trai had ordered a reduction in IUC to 6 paise per minute from 1 October 2017 from 14 paise earlier and an end to it from 1 January 2020.
The telecom operators, already reeling from a fierce price war that started with the entry of Reliance Jio in September 2016, were hit hard by the order. At the time Trai decided to scrap IUC, Airtel, Vodafone and Idea had resisted the change, while Jio was in favour.
“Even after considering that 100% subscribers of new greenfield operator i.e. Jio are on 4G VoLTE, 56% of overall subscribers are on 2G/3G networks... Also, 78% of Vodafone Idea’s subscriber base is on 2G/3G despite 4G VoLTE offered by the company and also competition," Vodafone Idea said in its comments to Trai.
State-run BSNL has also urged Trai to reconsider scrapping IUC.
Subscribe to Mint Newsletters
* Enter a valid email
* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.
Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint.
our App Now!!