The future
For the Saudi led OPEC to price oil in yuan, several things need to happen. First, the kingdom needs to be able to move its existing reserves and wealth away from the dollar. Interestingly, the Saudi Arabian holding of American treasury bonds has fallen over the years. It peaked at around $184.4 billion in February 2020 and fell to $125.3 billion two months later. As of January 2022, it stood at $119.4 billion, suggesting that it is difficult to move wealth away from the dollar beyond a point. The US government issues financial securities called treasury bonds to finance its fiscal deficit or the difference between what it earns and what it spends.
The size of the American government bond market is close to $23 trillion. It is by far the biggest bond market in the world and the most liquid. A buyer can always find a seller and vice versa. This is another major factor that has ensured that countries like to hold their reserves in dollars.
Further, data from the Organization of Economic Complexity suggests that in 2020, the total Saudi Arabian oil exports to China stood at $24.7 billion. So if the Saudis decide to sell oil to China in yuan, they will get paid in yuan. The country can then use these yuan to buy stuff from China.
The overall Saudi Arabian imports from China in 2020 had stood at $31.8 billion. So, all the yuan earned by selling oil can be used to buy Chinese imports.
Theoretically, it is possible to price the oil trade between Saudi Arabia and China in yuan. Nonetheless, it is worth remembering that the US still has the biggest military globally. In the past, attempts made by countries to price oil in currencies other than the dollar haven’t ended well.
As Graeber writes: “When Saddam Hussein made the bold move of single-handedly switching from the dollar to the euro in 2000, followed by Iran in 2001, this was quickly followed by American bombing and military occupation.”
Secondly, while pricing oil for China in yuan terms might work at a theoretical level, many other factors come into the picture for OPEC to be able to price a major part of its oil exports in yuan terms to countries other than China as well.
What will Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries do with all the yuan that come in? They can possibly buy Chinese imports. But what happens beyond that? All money needs to earn some return. It can’t sit around idle. The Chinese bond market, while being very big in size, is highly illiquid.
The overall size of the Chinese bond market (corporate, financial and government bonds) was around $18.6 trillion at the end of 2020.
Most of these bonds were held by government-owned banks and were not actively traded. This means that if OPEC prices oil in yuan terms, it will not have many investment avenues for the money that it earns by selling oil. That is a problem the dollar doesn’t have. By selling oil in dollars, the money that countries earn can easily be invested in US government bonds and other securities priced in dollars.
Also, the Chinese government will have to allow money to move freely in and out of China.
For that to happen, the Chinese government will have to set the yuan free and allow the market forces to determine its value, which is not the case currently. The value of the yuan is fixed against the dollar. If the yuan is set free, it is more than likely to appreciate against the dollar. This will make Chinese exports expensive, and that’s something the Chinese government won’t like.
Hence, any pricing of a good proportion of OPEC oil in Chinese yuan terms, if at all that happens, will only happen at a slow pace. The major reason for this is that money cannot move freely in and out of China, making the Chinese bond market highly illiquid.
Also, allowing money to leave China freely would mean that Chinese savings can also leave China. This is at the heart of the Chinese development model, wherein the government has been able to channel massive savings into areas it wants to. The government wouldn’t want to give away this advantage.
Further, the Chinese need to be okay with the idea of foreigners owning Chinese bonds, like the Americans are. As Robert D. Blackwill and Jennifer M. Harris write in War by Other Means: “A notable step in his direction unfolded in March 2012, when Japan became the first major developed country to receive Beijing’s blessing to invest in Chinese sovereign debt [government bonds].”
China is gradually coming around to this idea. A study carried out by the Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economics points out: “About 10% of China’s government bonds are in foreign hands.”
In 2021, a third of the US government debt was held by foreigners. Interestingly, this was at 40.2% in 2019. Foreign ownership as a proportion has fallen over the past two years primarily because the US Federal Reserve, in the aftermath of the covid pandemic, has printed money and bought government and other bonds to drive down interest rates.
There is another point that needs to be considered here. As Blackwill and Harris write: “The world has no modern precedent for a global reserve currency that is not administered by a democratic country.” While this might sound like a Western way of looking at things, it does matter, given that not many rich-world democratic countries will trust China and have their foreign exchange reserves in yuan and invest those reserves in Chinese government bonds.
This explains why despite the rapid rise of China, the total percentage of foreign exchange reserves in Chinese yuan in 2021 was at just 2.4%. The percentage of reserves held in the British pound was much greater at 4.7%. The Japanese yen was at 5.9%.
While the future of the Chinese yuan as an international reserve currency is very optimistic, it is highly unlikely that it will replace the dollar as the international reserve currency in a hurry. In fact, as the Chinese economist Andy Xie had said in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis: “There is no alternative to the dollar as a trading currency in Asia.” He felt that the yuan would replace the dollar in Asia, but it would take 30 to 40 years. To make a long story longer, what Xie said back then remains true.
|