
SIP calculators can make long-term investing look straightforward. Enter a monthly investment, assume a return and the projected corpus can run into several lakhs or even crores. But one assumption can make these illustrations look more attractive than what an investor may realistically achieve, i.e. the ability to invest the same amount every month for two decades.
DSP Mutual Fund’s September 2026 Netra report examines this through an affordability-adjusted SIP analysis. It compares a flat ₹10,000 monthly SIP with an SIP whose contribution rises in line with income. The analysis shows a sizeable difference in the final corpus.
A fixed SIP projection assumes that an investor can consistently set aside the same amount each month. But the amount that is affordable today may not have been affordable when the investment started.
DSP says ₹10,000 is roughly 55% of the average Indian’s monthly per-capita net national income today. Twenty years ago, the same ₹10,000 was more than 350% of the monthly per-capita NNI.
In other words, ₹10,000 was a much bigger financial burden for an average Indian back then than it is today.
To make the comparison more realistic, DSP calculated how much an investor could have invested 20 years ago if they were putting aside roughly the same share of their income as someone investing ₹10,000 a month today.
The SIP would have been ₹1,536 in FY2006-07, rising to ₹2,595 in FY2010-11, ₹4,317 in FY2015-16 and ₹5,795 in FY2020-21 before reaching ₹10,000 today.
Financial year | Income-adjusted monthly SIP |
| FY2006-07 | ₹1,536 |
| FY2010-11 | ₹2,595 |
| FY2015-16 | ₹4,317 |
| FY2020-21 | ₹5,795 |
| FY2025-26 | ₹10,000 |
| Source, DSP Mutual Fund. The SIP is calculated as 54.7% of monthly per-capita NNI. | |
This is important because a ₹10,000 SIP started 20 years ago is not necessarily a realistic representation of what an investor could have afforded at that time. The report says this is an example of the “problem of induction”, where investors use the past as a template for the future.
The difference in affordability becomes more apparent when the two SIP approaches are applied to the Nifty 50 TRI over 20 years.
According to DSP, a flat ₹10,000 monthly SIP from September 2006 to August 2026 would have meant investing ₹24 lakh in total. The resulting terminal value was ₹87.3 lakh.
The income-adjusted SIP, however, required a total investment of ₹12.2 lakh and produced a terminal value of ₹31.9 lakh.
Flat ₹10,000 SIP | Income-adjusted SIP | |
| Monthly SIP | ₹10,000 throughout | ₹1,536 to ₹10,000 |
| Period | Sep 2006-Aug 2026 | Sep 2006-Aug 2026 |
| Total invested | ₹24 lakh | ₹12.2 lakh |
| Final corpus | ₹87.3 lakh | ₹31.9 lakh |
| Source: DSP Mutual Fund. Based on Nifty 50 TRI. Returns are pre-tax and pre-exit-load. | ||
The difference is not being presented by DSP as a prediction of what future SIP investors will earn. Rather, the analysis highlights how a fixed-SIP illustration can differ from an investment pattern that accounts for affordability.
Affordability is not the only issue. DSP also highlights the risk of SIP stoppage and withdrawalas factors that can affect the eventual portfolio value.
Market downturns can coincide with job uncertainty, layoffs and pay cuts. These circumstances can force investors to stop SIPs or withdraw money when they need cash the most.
The report compares the final corpus when a 20-year SIP is stopped at different points in the journey.
Scenario | Final corpus |
| No stoppage | ₹87.3 lakh |
| SIP stopped during GFC 2008-09 | ₹75.7 lakh |
| SIP stopped during taper 2013-14 | ₹61.8 lakh |
| SIP stopped during Covid 2020-21 | ₹49.0 lakh |
| Source: DSP Mutual Fund | |
It also examined the impact of withdrawing 50% of the corpus at different points in the investment journey. A 50% withdrawal during the global financial crisis trough resulted in a final corpus of ₹75.7 lakh, compared with ₹61.8 lakh when the withdrawal occurred around the taper period and ₹49 lakh when it occurred at the Covid trough.
The broader message is that the headline corpus shown by a SIP illustration does not capture all the challenges involved in investing over two decades. The investor needs to be able to afford the contribution, continue it through difficult periods and avoid withdrawing the corpus at unfavourable points.
Kirti Jha is a Senior Content Producer at Mint, where she writes on mutual funds, taxation, personal finance and macroeconomic developments. Her reporting focuses on helping readers understand complex financial developments through data-driven, research-backed stories that explain how policy changes, market trends and regulatory decisions affect investors and households. <br><br> Before joining Mint, Kirti worked at ET Money, where she specialised in mutual fund research and investment analysis. She tracked portfolio disclosures, fund manager strategies, sectoral allocation shifts and investment trends, distilling large datasets into investor-focused insights. Her work combined quantitative analysis with consumer-centric storytelling, enabling readers to better understand fund positioning, portfolio changes and long-term investment opportunities.<br><br> Kirti holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics from Indraprastha College for Women, University of Delhi, and a Master's in Finance from the Jindal School of Banking & Finance at O.P. Jindal Global University. Her academic training emphasised analytical thinking, quantitative research and financial decision-making, providing a strong foundation in understanding capital markets, financial systems and economic policy. With a combined experience in investment research and financial journalism, she is committed to producing accurate, accessible and insightful journalism that empowers readers to make well-informed financial decisions.
Catch all the Instant Personal Loan, Business Loan, Business News, Money news, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.