
Only four multi-asset allocation funds have delivered SIP returns of more than 15% over the past three years, with Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund topping the category at 18.51%. According to AMFI, these schemes invest across at least three asset classes, with a minimum allocation of 10% to each. The assets can include equity, debt, gold, silver and other permitted investments.
The idea is to diversify across asset classes that can perform differently through market cycles. However, diversification does not mean similar returns across schemes. An analysis of multi-asset allocation funds with at least a three-year track record shows a wide variation in SIP returns. Only four funds delivered more than 15% over three years, while the lowest return was 7.52%.
Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund topped the three-year SIP return chart with 18.51%, followed by Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund at 17.64%. WhiteOak Capital Multi Asset Allocation Fund and Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund were the other two schemes to cross the 15% mark.
Fund | 3-year SIP return |
| Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 18.51% |
| Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 17.64% |
| WhiteOak Capital Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 16.35% |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 16.00% |
| Source: Value Research. Data as on 17th August 2026. | |
Axis Multi Asset Allocation Fund and SBI Multi Asset Allocation Fund delivered almost identical three-year SIP returns at 13.73% and 13.72%, respectively.
Baroda BNP Paribas Multi Asset Fund followed with 12.83%, while ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Fund delivered 11.77%. Tata Multi Asset Allocation Fund and UTI Multi Asset Allocation Fund posted 11.68% and 11.40%, respectively.
At the bottom of the three-year ranking were HDFC Multi-Asset Allocation Fund and Edelweiss Multi Asset Allocation Fund, with SIP returns of 9.90% and 7.52%, respectively.
This means there was a gap of nearly 11 percentage points between the best and worst performers in the three-year comparison. The difference is significant for investors using SIPs because even a seemingly modest difference in annualised returns can materially affect the value accumulated over time.
Quant again led the five-year SIP return chart, delivering 20.67%, followed by Nippon India at 18.42%.
But three other funds crossed the 15% mark over five years even though their three-year SIP returns were below 15%.
Fund | 5-year SIP return |
| Quant Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 20.67% |
| Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 18.42% |
| ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Fund | 15.49% |
| SBI Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 15.35% |
| UTI Multi Asset Allocation Fund | 15.16% |
| Source: Value Research. Data as on 17th August 2026. | |
ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Fund is a notable example. Its three-year SIP return was 11.77%, but the five-year figure was 15.49%. SBI Multi Asset Allocation Fund moved from 13.72% over three years to 15.35% over five years, while UTI Multi Asset Allocation Fund went from 11.40% to 15.16%.
Among the other schemes with five-year track records, Tata Multi Asset Allocation Fund delivered 13.68%, Axis Multi Asset Allocation Fund returned 12.95% and HDFC Multi-Asset Allocation Fund posted 12.06%.
The AUM data also shows that the largest schemes were not necessarily the top performers.
ICICI Prudential Multi Asset Fund is the largest scheme in the category, with net assets of ₹86,785 crore. Yet its three-year SIP return was 11.77%, placing it below the category leaders.
SBI Multi Asset Allocation Fund with an AUM of ₹20,240 crore has delivered 13.72% over three years. Nippon India Multi Asset Allocation Fund, with ₹16,926 crore in net assets, was the second-highest performer at 17.64%.
Quant, meanwhile, has net assets of ₹6,356 crore but it has delivered the highest three-year SIP return in the comparison.
This indicates that scheme size alone is not a useful indicator of recent SIP performance. The returns of multi-asset funds can vary depending on how individual schemes allocate money among equity, debt and commodities.
For investors, therefore, the multi-asset label should not be treated as a guarantee of a particular return profile. The asset mix, investment strategy and investment horizon can all influence the eventual outcome.
Kirti Jha is a Senior Content Producer at Mint, where she writes on mutual funds, taxation, personal finance and macroeconomic developments. Her reporting focuses on helping readers understand complex financial developments through data-driven, research-backed stories that explain how policy changes, market trends and regulatory decisions affect investors and households. <br><br> Before joining Mint, Kirti worked at ET Money, where she specialised in mutual fund research and investment analysis. She tracked portfolio disclosures, fund manager strategies, sectoral allocation shifts and investment trends, distilling large datasets into investor-focused insights. Her work combined quantitative analysis with consumer-centric storytelling, enabling readers to better understand fund positioning, portfolio changes and long-term investment opportunities.<br><br> Kirti holds a Bachelor's degree in Economics from Indraprastha College for Women, University of Delhi, and a Master's in Finance from the Jindal School of Banking & Finance at O.P. Jindal Global University. Her academic training emphasised analytical thinking, quantitative research and financial decision-making, providing a strong foundation in understanding capital markets, financial systems and economic policy. With a combined experience in investment research and financial journalism, she is committed to producing accurate, accessible and insightful journalism that empowers readers to make well-informed financial decisions.
Catch all the Instant Personal Loan, Business Loan, Business News, Money news, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.