
When it comes to estate or succession planning, ensuring clarity of words and intent in the legal document is key to preventing complications for your heir(s) when it is executed.
Today, we will discuss the difference between legal heirs and nominees, especially when it comes to inheritance, and how timely planning can help eliminate hurdles for your family in case of sudden death.
Under Indian law, those considered legal heirs include the deceased's spouse, children, and parents. If the deceased has no immediate relatives, their grandchildren will be considered the legal heirs; if there are no grandchildren, the deceased's sibling(s) will be considered the legal heirs.
Notably, in the absence of a will, a legal heir certificate is an important document for identifying and establishing the relationship between the legal heir and the deceased.
Nominees are usually named or designated by a bank account holder as the receiver of the account's funds in the case of their demise. The aim is to ensure smooth settlement and transfer of assets from the bank without the need for legal intervention.
Notably, however, a nominee need not be the legal heir and may act as the trustee for the legal heirs, e.g., in the case of minor children. The account holder usually designates a trusted person as a nominee, who can be a child, spouse, sibling, family member, or relative.
“Anyone is free to contest the inheritance of legal heirs, including nominees. However, a nominee cannot claim ownership rights as a result of the nomination. That being said, the legal heirs would be able to prove their right to such estate, by way of relation (for intestate succession) or will (for testamentary succession),” according to Bijal Ajinkya, Partner at Khaitan & Co.
He added that the legal heirs’ right to the estate is not impacted by the naming of a nominee, subject to certain exceptions — such as a life insurance policy.
Explaining further, Tanmay Patnaik, Partner - Private Client Practice at Trilegal, said that under the Insurance Act, 1938, certain “beneficial nominees” (such as the spouse, children, or parents of the policyholder) may be treated as having beneficial entitlement to policy proceeds. He, however, added that the Supreme Court has not fully settled whether such provisions override succession law. “For insurance policy proceeds, it is recommended to nominate those individuals who are intended to be the ultimate beneficiaries, and to draft the bequest of the life insurance proceeds under the Will accordingly,” Patnaik advised.
Nikita Seth, Legal Associate at Jotwani Associates, noted that a will allows individuals to deviate from statutory succession laws to choose beneficiaries. “If a person dies without a Will, assets are distributed based on personal laws, such as the Hindu Succession Act or Muslim Shariat laws,” she added.
According to Patnaik, the legal heirs retain the ultimate entitlement to the assets regardless of the nomination. He further added that if nominees fail or refuse to transfer the assets, the legal heirs are entitled to initiate civil proceedings to recover the same. “In practice, many financial institutions now expressly communicate to nominees that the nominee’s role is limited to receipt and facilitation of transfer to the rightful heirs,” he said.
Ajinkya noted that, for minor children, a major (parent, sibling, etc.) will hold the asset in a trust as a nominee. “If the nominee does not transfer the assets to the rightful legal heirs, being the minor children, then the minor children, through their legal representatives, will have to seek enforcement of title against the nominee,” he added.
Seth concurred that for minors, assets can be held in a fixed deposit or other secure form until they attain majority (age). She added that this is applicable across assets for: